Banks Nile F, Berry Alexander C, Rogers Emily M, Jenkins Nathaniel D M
Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Dec;24(12):1765-1778. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12215. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
The purpose of this study was to examine the skeletal muscle hypertrophic, architectural, and performance-related adaptations in response to volume-matched, total-body flywheel versus traditional resistance training in a randomized, non-exercise controlled study in physically active young adults. Thirty-one healthy young adults (24 ± 3 y) were randomized to 10 weeks of traditional resistance training (TRT; n = 7F/5M), flywheel training (FWRT; n = 7F/4M), or a habitual activity control (CON; n = 5F/3M). Maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIT), one repetition-maximum (1RM) for the free weight squat and bench press, three repetition work maximum (3W) for the flywheel squat and bench press, countermovement jump height, and broad jump distance, as well as site-specific muscle hypertrophy, fascicle length (FL), and pennation angle, were measured. Both TRT and FWRT increased MVIT (p ≤ 0.021) and FFM (p ≤ 0.032) compared to CON. However, TRT promoted superior improvements in free weight squat and bench 1RM (p < 0.001), and FWRT improved flywheel 3W squat and bench (p < 0.001). FWRT increased the FL and cross-sectional area of the distal VL, countermovement jump height, and broad jump distance (p ≤ 0.048), whereas TRT increased the pennation angle and cross-sectional area of the proximal VL. Therefore, 10 weeks of volume-matched, total-body traditional, and flywheel resistance training similarly increased maximal isometric strength and fat-free mass. However, FWRT promoted unique skeletal muscle architectural adaptations that likely contributed to region-specific VL hypertrophy and jump performance improvements. Thus, FWRT provides a novel training stimulus that promotes architectural adaptations that support improved athletic performance in a manner that is not provided by traditional resistance exercise training.
本研究旨在通过一项针对身体活跃的年轻成年人的随机、非运动对照研究,探究与传统阻力训练相比,等容量全身飞轮训练对骨骼肌肥大、结构及与运动表现相关的适应性变化。31名健康年轻成年人(24±3岁)被随机分为三组,分别进行为期10周的传统阻力训练(TRT;7名女性/5名男性)、飞轮训练(FWRT;7名女性/4名男性)或习惯性活动对照组(CON;5名女性/3名男性)。测量了最大自主等长扭矩(MVIT)、自由重量深蹲和卧推的一次重复最大值(1RM)、飞轮深蹲和卧推的三次重复最大值(3W)、反向纵跳高度和跳远距离,以及特定部位的肌肉肥大、肌束长度(FL)和羽状角。与CON组相比,TRT和FWRT组的MVIT(p≤0.021)和去脂体重(FFM;p≤0.032)均有所增加。然而,TRT组在自由重量深蹲和卧推1RM方面的改善更为显著(p<0.001),而FWRT组在飞轮深蹲和卧推3W方面表现更佳(p<0.001)。FWRT增加了股外侧肌远端的FL和横截面积、反向纵跳高度和跳远距离(p≤0.048),而TRT增加了股外侧肌近端的羽状角和横截面积。因此,为期10周的等容量全身传统阻力训练和飞轮阻力训练同样增加了最大等长力量和去脂体重。然而,FWRT促进了独特的骨骼肌结构适应性变化,这可能有助于股外侧肌特定区域的肥大和跳跃性能的改善。因此,FWRT提供了一种新的训练刺激,可促进结构适应性变化,以一种传统阻力训练无法提供的方式支持运动表现的提升。