Rauh P B, Clancy W G, Jasper L E, Curl L A, Belkoff S, Moorman C T
Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP2 8BJ, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Oct;92(10):1460-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.22749.
We evaluated two reconstruction techniques for a simulated posterolateral corner injury on ten pairs of cadaver knees. Specimens were mounted at 30° and 90° of knee flexion to record external rotation and varus movement. Instability was created by transversely sectioning the lateral collateral ligament at its midpoint and the popliteus tendon was released at the lateral femoral condyle. The left knee was randomly assigned for reconstruction using either a combined or fibula-based treatment with the right knee receiving the other. After sectioning, laxity increased in all the specimens. Each technique restored external rotatory and varus stability at both flexion angles to levels similar to the intact condition. For the fibula-based reconstruction method, varus laxity at 30° of knee flexion did not differ from the intact state, but was significantly less than after the combined method. Both the fibula-based and combined posterolateral reconstruction techniques are equally effective in restoring stability following the simulated injury.
我们在十对尸体膝关节上评估了两种针对模拟后外侧角损伤的重建技术。将标本固定在膝关节屈曲30°和90°位置,以记录外旋和内翻运动。通过在外侧副韧带中点横向切断以及在股骨外侧髁处松解腘肌腱来制造不稳定。随机指定左膝采用联合或基于腓骨的治疗方法进行重建,右膝则采用另一种方法。切断后,所有标本的松弛度均增加。每种技术在两个屈曲角度下均将外旋和内翻稳定性恢复到与完整状态相似的水平。对于基于腓骨的重建方法,膝关节屈曲30°时的内翻松弛度与完整状态无差异,但明显小于联合方法后的松弛度。基于腓骨和联合后外侧重建技术在模拟损伤后恢复稳定性方面同样有效。