Suppr超能文献

在确定改良拉森后外侧角重建术的理想股骨插入点时,解剖标志比放射学标志更准确。

Anatomical landmarks are more accurate in identifying the ideal femoral insertion for modified Larson reconstruction of posterolateral corner than radiological landmarks.

作者信息

Coppola Christian, Sigloch Maximilian, Hörmann Romed, Schmoelz Werner, Mayr Raul

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.

Department of Anatomy Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 19;12(2):e70282. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70282. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In surgery for posterolateral knee instabilities, the modified Larson technique (MLT) is a fibular tunnel-based reconstruction technique with a single femoral tunnel aiming for an isometric graft insertion point (IGIP). The IGIP can be located intraoperatively using an anatomically referenced method (ARM) or a radiological method (RM). The purpose of this experimental study was to compare the ARM with the RM in terms of isometric behaviour and to report the location of the ARM and RM in relation to the lateral epicondyle (LE).

METHODS

Flexion/extension movement of eight fresh-frozen human knee joints was simulated in a custom-made knee test bench. A fibular tunnel was created as described in the MLT, and a suture was shuttled from the IGIP through the tunnel and connected to a displacement transducer. The isometry of the IGIP of the ARM and RM was evaluated on the basis of suture displacement during flexion/extension motion. The position of the determined IGIP relative to the centre of the LE was measured on true lateral X-rays.

RESULTS

Comparison of the isometry behaviour of the two techniques showed that RM resulted in a displacement of 10.46 ± 3.69 mm, whereas the ARM showed a of 6.09 ± 2.11 mm during flexion/extension motion ( = 0.017). The median location of the ARM and RM was 6.5 mm (IQR 8.375 mm), 5.45 mm (IQR 3.5 mm) distal and 3.95 mm (IQR 6.9 mm), 4.55 mm (IQR 5.75 mm) anterior to the centre of the LE, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present in vitro experiment, the ARM was capable of determining the femoral IGIP more accurately than the radiological method. For clinical practice, it is recommended to start approximately 6.5 mm distal and 3.95 mm anterior to the centre of the LE in order to determine the IGIP when performing MLT.

摘要

目的

在膝关节后外侧不稳定的手术中,改良拉森技术(MLT)是一种基于腓骨隧道的重建技术,采用单个股骨隧道,目标是找到等长移植物插入点(IGIP)。术中可使用解剖参考方法(ARM)或放射学方法(RM)来定位IGIP。本实验研究的目的是比较ARM和RM在等长特性方面的差异,并报告ARM和RM相对于外侧髁(LE)的位置。

方法

在定制的膝关节试验台上模拟八个新鲜冷冻人体膝关节的屈伸运动。按照MLT的描述创建一个腓骨隧道,将一根缝线从IGIP穿过隧道并连接到位移传感器。根据屈伸运动过程中的缝线位移评估ARM和RM的IGIP的等长性。在真正的侧位X射线上测量确定的IGIP相对于LE中心的位置。

结果

两种技术等长特性的比较表明,在屈伸运动过程中,RM导致的位移为10.46±3.69毫米,而ARM为6.09±2.11毫米(P = 0.017)。ARM和RM的中位位置分别在LE中心远端6.5毫米(四分位间距8.375毫米)、前方3.95毫米(四分位间距6.9毫米)以及远端5.45毫米(四分位间距3.5毫米)、前方4.55毫米(四分位间距5.75毫米)处。

结论

在当前的体外实验中,ARM比放射学方法能够更准确地确定股骨IGIP。对于临床实践,建议在进行MLT时,从LE中心远端约6.5毫米和前方3.95毫米处开始确定IGIP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e15/12086792/a98b8cd6154d/JEO2-12-e70282-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验