Haas L
Institute for Health Economics and Management, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg.
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Jul;73(7):409-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255083. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
The measurement of patient preferences on the basis of perceived quality of care in a comparison of two ambulatory health-care centres (medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, MVZ) with traditional ambulatory care consisting of single ambulatory practices was undertaken. The influence of the patients' perceived quality of care on patients' preference for an MVZ or traditional ambulatory care setting was analysed. Determinants of the patients' preference were identified.
310 questionnaires were distributed to patients in 2 MVZ. The preference measurement is derived from a comparison of 17 quality items in MVZ and traditional ambulatory care settings. Quality items were derived from the literature. The developed research instrument consists of 17 items on a 7-point Likert scale (1=much better to 7=much worse). T-Tests were used to test if the quality of care in MVZ was rated significantly differently in comparison to traditional ambulatory care. The determinants of the patients' preference were identified using a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
310 questionnaires were handed out and the response rate was 92.3% (n=286). 15 out of 17 quality items were rated in favour of the MVZ. Determinants of the patients' preference were the following (n=286, corrected R (2)=0.29): (1) time doctors take for the patient's treatment, (2) medical competence of doctors, (3) counselling regarding preventive examinations (p<0.01).
The judgment in favour of the ambulatory health-care centres (MVZ) could be explained by organisational structures typical of these centres, e. g., the increased information sharing and cooperation amongst doctors. The identified determinants of the patients' "preference" indicate a practical approach for attaining a preference position in the health market, both for medical care centres as well as for single medical practices.
在比较两个门诊医疗中心(medizinisches Versorgungszentrum,MVZ)与由单一门诊诊所组成的传统门诊护理时,基于感知的护理质量对患者偏好进行测量。分析患者感知的护理质量对患者选择MVZ或传统门诊护理环境的影响。确定患者偏好的决定因素。
向两个MVZ的患者发放了310份问卷。偏好测量来自于对MVZ和传统门诊护理环境中17个质量项目的比较。质量项目来自文献。所开发的研究工具由17个项目组成,采用7点李克特量表(1 = 好得多至7 = 差得多)。使用t检验来测试MVZ的护理质量与传统门诊护理相比是否有显著差异。使用逐步多元回归分析确定患者偏好的决定因素。
发放了310份问卷,回复率为92.3%(n = 286)。17个质量项目中有15个被评为有利于MVZ。患者偏好的决定因素如下(n = 286,校正R(2)= 0.29):(1)医生为患者治疗所花费的时间,(2)医生的医疗能力,(3)关于预防性检查的咨询(p < 0.01)。
对门诊医疗中心(MVZ)的支持判断可以通过这些中心典型的组织结构来解释,例如医生之间增加的信息共享和合作。所确定的患者“偏好”的决定因素为医疗中心以及单一医疗诊所提供了一种在健康市场中获得偏好地位的实用方法。