Behmann M, Bisson S, Walter U
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung und Stiftungslehrstuhl Prävention und Rehabilitation in der System- und Versorgungsforschung, Hannover.
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Dec;73(12):853-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265191. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
The 9 (th) Revision of German Medical Licensing Regulations for Physicians has come into effect on October 1 (st) 2003. Social medicine was separated into the fields ""occupational health, social medicine" and the various cross-sectional modules: epidemiology, biometry, medical computer science; health economics, health-care system, public health; prevention, health promotion; rehabilitation, physical medicine, naturopathic treatment. This paper studies the realisation of teaching in the field social medicine at German medical faculties.
The survey was conducted in collaboration with the German Association for Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP). A survey was conducted at 38 institutes of 36 German medical faculties. The written questionnaire contained mostly selection items in which chances and barriers of the field were queried with supply items. Information about time scale, general conditions and resources was aked for. On the basis of the guidelines of the DGSMP, the topics to be taught were evaluated concerning their relevance and integration into education.
The response rate was 68% (n=26). Social insurance, basic principles, responsibility in the Social Security Code and the different providers were judged as the most important topics. There was a strong demand for lecturing material. 82% (n=18) of the faculties wished to have specific material, for example e-learning, examples, lesson plans, curricula and also textbooks. 91% (n=19) of the faculties requested an exchange of information between the faculties concerning educational contents, motivation of students and e-learning.
The realisation of teaching is different between the faculties concerning the number of hours, teaching methods and number of students per year. The motivation of the students is one of the problems, but also the lack of acceptance within the clinic. Specific resources and exchange between the faculties are necessary concerning e-learning, which is offered at only few faculties so far, but interest for a more intensive usage exists. Potentials of social medicine are the promotion of awareness among the students and the "identification of basics for medical acts in the social security system". Social medicine offers the possibility to connect the theoretical institutes with the clinic.
德国医生执照条例第9版于2003年10月1日生效。社会医学被划分为“职业健康、社会医学”领域以及各个交叉模块:流行病学、生物统计学、医学计算机科学;健康经济学、医疗保健系统、公共卫生;预防、健康促进;康复、物理医学、自然疗法。本文研究德国医学院校社会医学领域教学的实施情况。
该调查是与德国社会医学与预防协会(DGSMP)合作开展的。对德国36所医学院校的38个机构进行了调查。书面问卷大多包含选择题,通过提供的选项询问该领域的机遇和障碍。还询问了关于时间安排、一般条件和资源的信息。根据DGSMP的指导方针,对要教授的主题在相关性和融入教育方面进行了评估。
回复率为68%(n = 26)。社会保险、基本原则、社会保障法典中的责任以及不同的提供者被判定为最重要的主题。对教材有强烈需求。82%(n = 18)的医学院希望有特定的教材,例如电子学习资料、实例、教案、课程设置以及教科书。91%(n = 19)的医学院要求各院校之间就教学内容、学生积极性和电子学习进行信息交流。
各医学院在教学时长、教学方法和每年的学生人数方面,教学实施情况存在差异。学生的积极性是问题之一,临床机构内部的接受度不足也是问题。在电子学习方面,各院校之间需要特定的资源和交流,目前只有少数院校提供电子学习,但对更广泛使用电子学习存在兴趣。社会医学的潜力在于提高学生的认识以及“确定社会保障体系中医疗行为的基础”。社会医学提供了将理论机构与临床联系起来的可能性。