Rittner C, Stradmann-Bellinghausen B, Rogde S
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, FRG.
Complement Inflamm. 1990;7(4-6):243-7. doi: 10.1159/000463155.
Using two different typing techniques (i.e. polyacrylamide gel isoelectric focusing (PAGIF) with Western blot and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of precipitated C8 under nonreducing conditions with Western blot), the following observations were made during the reference typing for C81 (C8A). The Japanese variant A1J is probably identical with A1Cauc, whereas B1J is definitely different from B1Cauc and could therefore provisionally be named HB3'. Variant 'A2' from Japan is focused in an intermediate position, but different from M1 and could be named 'M2'. Both variants possess normal A subunits. B2 from Japan is clearly different from B1Cauc and should retain its designation. In PAGIF, its subunit has a position more anodal than A. Summarizing these results, more information is needed before a final nomenclature can be proposed.
采用两种不同的分型技术(即聚丙烯酰胺凝胶等电聚焦(PAGIF)结合蛋白质印迹法,以及在非还原条件下对沉淀的C8进行十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳结合蛋白质印迹法),在C81(C8A)的参考分型过程中得出了以下观察结果。日本变异体A1J可能与A1Cauc相同,而B1J肯定与B1Cauc不同,因此可暂命名为“HB3'”。来自日本的变异体“A2”聚焦于中间位置,但与M1不同,可命名为“M2”。这两种变异体均具有正常的A亚基。来自日本的B2明显不同于B1Cauc,应保留其名称。在PAGIF中,其亚基的位置比A更偏向阳极。总结这些结果,在提出最终命名之前还需要更多信息。