Suppr超能文献

更简单的重度抑郁症定义的有效性。

Validity of a simpler definition of major depressive disorder.

机构信息

The Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence, USA.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2010 Oct;27(10):977-81. doi: 10.1002/da.20710.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In previous reports from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we developed a briefer definition of major depressive disorder (MDD), and found high levels of agreement between the simplified and DSM-IV definitions of MDD. The goal of the present study was to examine the validity of the simpler definition of MDD. We hypothesized that compared to patients with adjustment disorder, patients with MDD would be more severely depressed, have poorer psychosocial functioning, have greater suicidal ideation at the time of the intake evaluation, and have an increased morbid risk for depression in their first-degree family members.

METHODS

We compared 1,486 patients who met the symptom criteria for current MDD according to either DSM-IV or the simpler definition to 145 patients with a current diagnosis of adjustment disorder with depressed mood or depressed and anxious mood.

RESULTS

The patients with MDD were more severely depressed, more likely to have missed time from work due to psychiatric reasons, reported higher levels of suicidal ideation, and had a significantly higher morbid risk for depression in their first-degree family members. Both definitions of MDD were valid.

CONCLUSIONS

The simpler definition of MDD was as valid as the DSM-IV definition. This new definition offers two advantages over the DSM-IV definition-it is briefer and therefore more likely to be recalled and applied in clinical practice, and it is free of somatic symptoms thereby making it easier to apply with medically ill patients.

摘要

背景

在罗德岛改善诊断评估和服务项目的先前报告中,我们提出了一个更简短的重性抑郁障碍(MDD)定义,并发现简化版和 DSM-IV 版 MDD 定义之间有高度的一致性。本研究的目的是检验 MDD 更简单定义的有效性。我们假设,与适应障碍患者相比,MDD 患者抑郁程度更严重,社会心理功能更差,在接受评估时自杀意念更强烈,并且其一级亲属患抑郁症的病态风险增加。

方法

我们将符合 DSM-IV 或更简单定义的当前 MDD 症状标准的 1486 例患者与 145 例当前诊断为心境恶劣或心境恶劣和焦虑的适应障碍患者进行了比较。

结果

MDD 患者抑郁程度更严重,因精神原因缺勤的可能性更高,自杀意念水平更高,一级亲属患抑郁症的病态风险显著增加。MDD 的两种定义均有效。

结论

MDD 的简单定义与 DSM-IV 定义一样有效。这个新的定义比 DSM-IV 定义有两个优势——它更简洁,因此更有可能在临床实践中被回忆和应用,并且它没有躯体症状,因此更容易应用于患有躯体疾病的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验