Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Arthroscopy. 2010 Oct;26(10):1281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Biomechanical comparison of different suture-bridge configurations of the medial row with respect to initial construct stability (time 0, porcine model).
In 40 porcine fresh-frozen shoulders, the infraspinatus tendons were dissected from their insertions. All specimens were operated on by use of the suture-bridge technique, only differing in terms of the medial-row suture-grasping configuration, and randomized into 4 groups: (1) single-mattress (SM) technique, (2) double-mattress (DM) technique, (3) cross-stitch (CS) technique, and (4) double-pulley (DP) technique. Identical suture anchors were used for all specimens (medial: Bio-Corkscrew FT 5.5 [Arthrex, Naples, FL]; lateral: Bio-PushLock 3.5 [Arthrex]). All repairs were cyclically loaded from 10 to 60 N until 10 to 200 N (20-N stepwise increase after 50 cycles each) with a material testing machine. Forces at 3 and 5 mm of gap formation, mode of failure, and maximum load to failure were recorded.
The DM technique had the highest ultimate tensile strength (368.6 ± 99.5 N) compared with the DP (248.4 ± 122.7 N), SM (204.3 ± 90 N), and CS (184.9 ± 63.8 N) techniques (P = .004). The DM technique provided maximal force resistance until 3 and 5 mm of gap formation (90.0 ± 18.1 N and 128.0 ± 32.3 N, respectively) compared with the CS (72 ± 8.9 N and 108 ± 20.2 N, respectively), SM (66.0 ± 8.9 N and 90.0 ± 26.9 N, respectively), and DP (62.2 ± 6.2 N and 71 ± 13.2 N, respectively) techniques (P < .05 for each 3 and 5 mm of gap formation). The main failure mode was suture cutting through the tendon.
Comparing the 4 different suture-bridge techniques, we found that modified application of suture-bridge repair with double medial mattress stitches significantly enhanced biomechanical construct stability at time 0 in this porcine ex vivo model.
This technique increases initial stability and resistance to suture cutting through the rotator cuff tendon after arthroscopic suture-bridge repair.
比较不同内侧排缝线桥接配置在初始构建稳定性方面的生物力学差异(时间 0,猪模型)。
在 40 个猪冷冻新鲜肩部中,从其插入部位解剖出冈下肌腱。所有标本均采用缝线桥接技术进行操作,仅在内侧排缝线抓取配置方面存在差异,并随机分为 4 组:(1)单褥式(SM)技术,(2)双褥式(DM)技术,(3)十字缝(CS)技术和(4)双滑索(DP)技术。所有标本均使用相同的缝线锚钉(内侧:Bio-Corkscrew FT 5.5 [Arthrex,那不勒斯,佛罗里达州];外侧:Bio-PushLock 3.5 [Arthrex])。所有修复均在材料试验机上进行循环加载,从 10 到 60N,每 50 次循环增加 20N,直至 10 到 200N。记录形成 3mm 和 5mm 间隙时的力、失效模式和最大失效负荷。
DM 技术的最终拉伸强度(368.6±99.5N)最高,与 DP(248.4±122.7N)、SM(204.3±90N)和 CS(184.9±63.8N)技术相比(P=0.004)。DM 技术在形成 3mm 和 5mm 间隙时提供最大的力阻力(分别为 90.0±18.1N 和 128.0±32.3N),与 CS(分别为 72±8.9N 和 108±20.2N)、SM(分别为 66.0±8.9N 和 90.0±26.9N)和 DP(分别为 62.2±6.2N 和 71±13.2N)技术相比(每形成 3mm 和 5mm 间隙时均为 P<0.05)。主要失效模式是缝线穿过肌腱切割。
在比较 4 种不同的缝线桥接技术后,我们发现这种改良的内侧双褥式缝线桥接修复技术在猪的离体模型中显著增强了初始生物力学构建稳定性。
该技术增加了关节镜下缝线桥接修复后冈上肌腱的初始稳定性和缝线切割阻力。