Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.007.
Little information is available on the results of the different stabilization techniques described for treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. Additionally, no studies have analyzed isometric performance of the shoulder after AC stabilization. The objective of our study was to present functional outcome including isokinetic testing and radiographic evaluation of patients treated with stabilization of AC joint dislocations.
Thirty-seven patients with acute type III to V AC joint disruption underwent open coracoclavicular (CC) and AC stabilization with nonabsorbable sutures.
The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 2.5 years (range, 2-10.5). The mean Constant score (CS) was 96. There were 34 (91.9%) excellent results, 1 good (2.7%), 1 satisfactory (2.7%), and 1 fair (2.7%). The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire revealed good overall subjective evaluation with a mean of 7 points. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain score was 0.8. Patients with a CC distance <5 mm, or an anterosuperior AC reduction less than 50%, showed significantly better results in CS and DASH score in comparison to patients with a subluxated AC joint (P < .005). Twenty-two patients agreed to undergo isokinetic evaluation. We were unable to demonstrate any clinically significant difference between the involved and the uninvolved side.
The described technique of cerclage augmentation offers an attractive alternative in AC joint stabilization, with good to excellent results. In comparison to other techniques, there were no complications related to any implants, no graft donor site morbidity, or need for implant removal.
对于急性肩锁关节(AC)损伤的不同稳定技术的结果,相关信息有限。此外,尚无研究分析 AC 稳定后肩部等速性能。我们的研究目的是介绍功能结果,包括使用 AC 关节脱位稳定技术治疗的患者的等速测试和影像学评估。
37 例急性 III 至 V 型 AC 关节脱位患者接受了开放性喙锁(CC)和 AC 稳定的非吸收缝线。
平均随访时间为 4.5 ± 2.5 年(范围,2-10.5)。平均 Constant 评分(CS)为 96。34 例(91.9%)为优秀,1 例(2.7%)为良好,1 例(2.7%)为满意,1 例(2.7%)为尚可。手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷显示整体主观评估良好,平均得分为 7 分。平均视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分为 0.8。CC 距离<5mm 或 AC 前上复位<50%的患者,CS 和 DASH 评分明显优于 AC 关节半脱位的患者(P<0.005)。22 例患者同意接受等速评估。我们未能证明患侧和健侧之间存在任何具有临床意义的差异。
描述的环扎增强技术在 AC 关节稳定中提供了一种有吸引力的替代方法,结果为优至良。与其他技术相比,没有任何与植入物相关的并发症,没有移植物供区的发病率,也不需要取出植入物。