• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩锁关节分离:通过缝合锚修复喙锁韧带和不可吸收缝线固定肩锁关节。

Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct;12(5):1362-1371. doi: 10.1111/os.12771. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1111/os.12771
PMID:32893498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7670157/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III-V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non-absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double-loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 12-56 months). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant-Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6- and 12-month follow-up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

CC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non-absorbable heavy sutures on high-grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.

摘要

目的

评估使用 2 个缝线锚钉和非吸收性粗缝线固定肩锁关节(AC)治疗 Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位患者的临床和影像学结果,所有患者均获得至少 1 年的随访。

方法

回顾性分析 2013 年 12 月至 2018 年 12 月采用 2 个缝线锚钉重建喙锁韧带和 2 根非吸收性缝线固定 AC 治疗急性 AC 脱位的 36 例(26 例男性,10 例女性)患者的临床和影像学结果。用 2 个 3.5mm 的缝线锚钉分别从前外侧和后内侧将喙锁韧带固定在喙突上,缝线穿过锁骨上的孔并用 2.0mm 的钻头固定,然后在锁骨上打结。所有患者均采用 2 根非吸收性粗缝线进行额外的 AC 关节加固。在术后 3、6 和 12 个月及末次随访时,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医生协会(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley 评分和简单肩部测试(SST)问卷对肩部功能进行最终评估。比较基线和治疗结果。影像学分析包括垂直移位和水平移位。

结果

共有 29 例患者(20 例男性,9 例女性)纳入研究。总共 7 例、6 例和 16 例患者为 Rockwood Ⅲ型、Ⅳ型和Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位。患者的平均年龄为 42.8±13.5 岁,平均随访时间为 28 个月(12-56 个月)。在 12 个月的随访时,ASES 评分平均为 92.1±3.5,VAS 平均疼痛评分为 0.5±0.7,Constant-Murley 评分平均为 93.0±2.4。SST 的新阳性答案数为 11.5±0.6。与基线相比,临床结果显著改善(P<0.05)。6 个月和 12 个月的随访评估结果无显著差异(P>0.05)。影像学显示 2 例部分复位丢失,但所有患者均无水平移位。1 例患者术后 3 周出现浅表伤口感染,经常规伤口护理后愈合。无神经血管并发症记录。

结论

对于高等级肩锁关节脱位,使用 2 个缝线锚钉重建喙锁韧带和 2 根非吸收性粗缝线固定肩锁关节是一种可靠的技术,可恢复肩锁关节的稳定性,并可获得良好至优秀的临床效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/5a53583014e2/OS-12-1362-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/18abd7ae2cf5/OS-12-1362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/e6725e1fcb6a/OS-12-1362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/2ac481c1b995/OS-12-1362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/88a13934c1b5/OS-12-1362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/1bde1a4f0a2f/OS-12-1362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/39e29fbb27a1/OS-12-1362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/d8c4bcaadd70/OS-12-1362-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/147138675f69/OS-12-1362-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/05b5533124ef/OS-12-1362-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/a5b877e684e7/OS-12-1362-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/02b8b72655af/OS-12-1362-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/9f7a5341aedb/OS-12-1362-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/5a53583014e2/OS-12-1362-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/18abd7ae2cf5/OS-12-1362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/e6725e1fcb6a/OS-12-1362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/2ac481c1b995/OS-12-1362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/88a13934c1b5/OS-12-1362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/1bde1a4f0a2f/OS-12-1362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/39e29fbb27a1/OS-12-1362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/d8c4bcaadd70/OS-12-1362-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/147138675f69/OS-12-1362-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/05b5533124ef/OS-12-1362-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/a5b877e684e7/OS-12-1362-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/02b8b72655af/OS-12-1362-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/9f7a5341aedb/OS-12-1362-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd42/7670157/5a53583014e2/OS-12-1362-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint.肩锁关节分离:通过缝合锚修复喙锁韧带和不可吸收缝线固定肩锁关节。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct;12(5):1362-1371. doi: 10.1111/os.12771. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
2
Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.关节镜下喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位
J Nippon Med Sch. 2018;85(3):166-171. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2018_85-24.
3
Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocation using 2 suture anchors and coracoacromial ligament transfer.使用2枚缝线锚钉和喙肩韧带转移术进行喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):346-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324968. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
4
Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up.采用游离肌腱移植物的解剖型肩锁关节韧带重建(ACCR)在中期随访时对于慢性肩锁关节损伤是有效的。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2096-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06123-0. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.钩钢板与双隧道喙锁韧带重建治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
All-Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Severe Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.全关节镜下重建重度慢性肩锁关节脱位。
Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1324-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.058.
7
Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes.采用半腱肌双束自体移植物和皮质纽扣重建喙锁和肩锁韧带治疗慢性肩锁关节脱位:临床和影像学结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):e507-e518. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
Arthroscopic Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Triple- Versus Single-Bundle Reconstruction.关节镜下治疗慢性肩锁关节脱位:双束与单束重建对比
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):482-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515615583. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries.与成功的非手术治疗相比,对于慢性原发性 III 型至 V 型肩锁关节损伤,转换为解剖型喙锁韧带重建(ACCR)显示出相似的临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2264-2271. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06159-2. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.慢性肩锁关节脱位的杂交型肩锁关节和肩峰锁骨关节重建可获得良好的功能和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2084-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06790-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors related to loss of reduction after anatomic repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation in patients with acute traumatic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.急性创伤性肩锁关节脱位患者肩锁关节脱位解剖修复后复位丢失的相关危险因素。
JSES Int. 2025 Jan 27;9(3):625-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.020. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Is there a role for acromioclavicular (AC) joint capsular repair and reconstruction in high-grade AC separations? A systematic review.肩锁关节囊修复与重建在重度肩锁关节分离中是否具有作用?一项系统评价。
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Feb 3;10(2):115-124. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2023-0121. Print 2025 Feb 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Functional and Radiological Outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation with Anchors Associated with Clavicle and Scapula Fixation.使用锚钉联合锁骨与肩胛骨固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的手术功能及影像学结果
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Dec;54(6):649-656. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697020. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Evaluation of the Clavicle Hook Plate for Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Cadaveric Study.锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的评估:一项尸体研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan;34(1):e20-e25. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001632.
3
Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique.
Fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case series.
使用缝线锚钉手术修复肩锁关节脱位时的固定失败和早期复位丢失:病例系列
JSES Int. 2024 Jul 8;8(5):984-989. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.011. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Early to Mid-term Results of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using the Infinity-Lock Button System in the Management of Traumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and Lateral End of Clavicle Fractures.使用Infinity-Lock纽扣系统重建喙锁韧带治疗创伤性肩锁关节脱位和锁骨外侧端骨折的早期至中期结果
Cureus. 2024 May 23;16(5):e60936. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60936. eCollection 2024 May.
5
An In Vitro Study Demonstrating the Significance of Acromioclavicular Ligament Repair in Restoring Horizontal and Rotational Acromioclavicular Joint Stability.一项体外研究表明肩锁韧带修复在恢复肩锁关节水平和旋转稳定性方面的重要性。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):e57193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57193. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.五种不同手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1944-1958. doi: 10.1111/os.13731. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
7
Horizontal instability after acromioclavicular joint reduction using the two-hole technique is preferred over the loop technique: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.使用双孔技术进行肩锁关节复位后的水平不稳定优于环扎技术:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):224-229. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00871. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis.除钩钢板固定外,喙锁韧带增强术对急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05142-x.
9
Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Special Issue.《肩肘外科特刊》
Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct;12(5):1337-1339. doi: 10.1111/os.12813.
肩锁关节重建:双喙锁隧道技术中附加肩锁关节环形扎带并不能提高水平稳定性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3827-3834. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05674-1. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Systematic Review.肩锁关节的水平不稳定:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):504-510. doi: 10.1177/0363546519831013. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
5
Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Evidence-based Treatment.肩锁关节损伤:循证治疗。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep 1;27(17):e775-e788. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00105.
6
Editorial Commentary: Biomechanics of All Suture Anchors: What We Know So Far.社论评论:所有缝线锚钉的生物力学:目前我们所知道的。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2796-2798. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.07.010.
7
Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.尽管明显提高了水平稳定性,但在进行喙锁韧带重建时进行肩锁关节增强并不能改善功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3747-3763. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5152-7. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Challenges in Treating Acromioclavicular Separations: Current Concepts.治疗肩锁关节分离的挑战:当前概念。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Oct 1;26(19):669-677. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00776.
9
Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.肩锁关节不稳定的肩锁和喙锁韧带重建:临床和影像学结果的系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1979-1995.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
10
Shoulder Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions.肩部肩锁和喙锁韧带损伤:常见问题与解决方案
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Apr;37(2):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.12.002.