Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3842-3850. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06978-5. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction.
Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.4 ± 12.6 years (19-56), who underwent hardware removal 18.2 ± 15.0 months following arthroscopically assisted stabilization surgery using a suspensory fixation system for AC joint injury between 01/2012 and 01/2021 were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) as well as the clavicular dislocation/acromial thickness (D/A) ratio were measured on anterior-posterior radiographs prior to hardware removal and immediately postoperatively by two independent raters. Loss of reduction, defined as 10% increase in the CCD, was deemed substantial if the CCD increased 6 mm compared to preoperatively. Constitutional and surgical characteristics were assessed in a subgroup analysis to detect risk factors associated with loss of reduction.
Postoperatively, the CCD significantly increased from 12.6 ± 3.7 mm (4.8-19.0) to 14.5 ± 3.3 mm (8.7-20.6 mm) (p < 0.001) while the D/A ratio increased from 0.4 ± 0.3 (- 0.4-0.9) to 0.6 ± 0.3 (1.1-0.1) (p = 0.034) compared to preoperatively. In 10 cases (45%), loss of reduction was identified, while a substantial loss of reduction (> 6 mm) was only observed in one patient (4.5%). A shorter time interval between index stabilization surgery and hardware removal significantly corresponded to immediate loss of reduction (11.0 ± 5.6 vs. 30.0 ± 20.8 months; p = 0.007), as hardware removal within one year following index stabilization was significantly associated with immediate loss of reduction (p = 0.027; relative risk 3.4; odds ratio 11.67).
Substantial loss of reduction after hardware removal of a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system was rare, indicating that the postoperative result of AC stabilization is not categorically at risk when performing this procedure. Even though radiological assessment of the patients showed a statistically significant immediate superior clavicular displacement after this rarely required procedure, with an increased incidence in the first year following stabilization, this may not negatively influence the results of ACJ stabilization in a clinically relevant way.
IV.
评估使用高强度缝线锚钉悬吊固定系统行关节镜辅助肩锁关节(AC)稳定术后取出内固定物时即刻复位丢失的情况,并确定与即刻复位丢失相关的危险因素。
本回顾性单中心研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2012 年 1 月期间,22 例年龄 36.4±12.6 岁(19-56 岁)的连续患者,这些患者均因 AC 关节损伤而行关节镜辅助稳定手术后,使用悬吊固定系统固定,18.2±15.0 个月后取出内固定物。在取出内固定物之前和术后即刻,由两名独立的评估者在前后位 X 线片上测量喙锁间距(CCD)和锁骨脱位/肩峰厚度(D/A)比值。如果 CCD 比术前增加 6mm,则认为是明显的复位丢失,定义为增加 10%。在亚组分析中评估了体质和手术特征,以确定与复位丢失相关的危险因素。
术后,CCD 从 12.6±3.7mm(4.8-19.0)显著增加至 14.5±3.3mm(8.7-20.6mm)(p<0.001),而 D/A 比值从 0.4±0.3(-0.4-0.9)增加至 0.6±0.3(1.1-0.1)(p=0.034)。与术前相比。10 例(45%)患者存在复位丢失,而仅 1 例(4.5%)患者存在明显的复位丢失(>6mm)。指数稳定手术后和取出内固定物之间的时间间隔越短,与即刻复位丢失显著相关(11.0±5.6 vs. 30.0±20.8 个月;p=0.007),而指数稳定手术后 1 年内进行取出内固定物与即刻复位丢失显著相关(p=0.027;相对风险 3.4;优势比 11.67)。
使用高强度缝线锚钉悬吊固定系统取出内固定物后,出现明显复位丢失的情况很少见,这表明行该操作时,AC 稳定术后的结果不会明显处于风险之中。尽管对患者进行的影像学评估显示,在进行这种很少需要的操作后,锁骨有统计学意义的即刻向上移位,但在稳定后第一年的发生率增加,这可能不会以临床上有意义的方式对 ACJ 稳定的结果产生负面影响。
IV。