Suppr超能文献

轻度狭窄会使血管痉挛性心绞痛的预后更差。

Mild stenosis makes prognosis of vasospastic angina worse.

作者信息

Takatsu Fumimaro, Watarai Masato

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283402313.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that significant coronary narrowing makes the prognosis of vasospastic angina pectoris (VAP) worse. However, the effects of various factors on the prognosis of patients without significant arterial narrowing have not yet been shown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 1248 consecutive patients with VAP who had no coronary stenosis of more than or equal to 50%. The mean follow-up was 11.7±6.8 years. Ninety-one patients (7.3%) developed unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, or effort angina with new coronary narrowings. Thirty patients (2.4%) died suddenly. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of coronary stenosis, even if trivial, made the prognosis worse (P=0.027; odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.61). In addition, unusually, female patients had a better prognosis than male patients (P=0.007; odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75). Other factors, such as hyperlipemia, diabetes, and hypertension did not affect the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In patients with VAP, the presence of coronary narrowing, even if mild, was associated with worse prognosis.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,显著的冠状动脉狭窄会使变异性心绞痛(VAP)的预后变差。然而,各种因素对无显著动脉狭窄患者预后的影响尚未明确。

方法与结果

我们对1248例连续的无冠状动脉狭窄≥50%的VAP患者进行了调查。平均随访时间为11.7±6.8年。91例患者(7.3%)发生了不稳定型心绞痛、急性心肌梗死或伴有新的冠状动脉狭窄的劳力性心绞痛。30例患者(2.4%)猝死。多因素分析显示,即使冠状动脉狭窄程度轻微,也会使预后变差(P = 0.027;比值比,1.66;95%置信区间,1.06 - 2.61)。此外,不同寻常的是,女性患者的预后优于男性患者(P = 0.007;比值比,0.35;95%置信区间,0.16 - 0.75)。其他因素,如高脂血症、糖尿病和高血压,并不影响预后。

结论

在VAP患者中,即使冠状动脉狭窄程度较轻,也与较差的预后相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验