• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度狭窄会使血管痉挛性心绞痛的预后更差。

Mild stenosis makes prognosis of vasospastic angina worse.

作者信息

Takatsu Fumimaro, Watarai Masato

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283402313.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283402313
PMID:20890183
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that significant coronary narrowing makes the prognosis of vasospastic angina pectoris (VAP) worse. However, the effects of various factors on the prognosis of patients without significant arterial narrowing have not yet been shown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 1248 consecutive patients with VAP who had no coronary stenosis of more than or equal to 50%. The mean follow-up was 11.7±6.8 years. Ninety-one patients (7.3%) developed unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, or effort angina with new coronary narrowings. Thirty patients (2.4%) died suddenly. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of coronary stenosis, even if trivial, made the prognosis worse (P=0.027; odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.61). In addition, unusually, female patients had a better prognosis than male patients (P=0.007; odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75). Other factors, such as hyperlipemia, diabetes, and hypertension did not affect the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In patients with VAP, the presence of coronary narrowing, even if mild, was associated with worse prognosis.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,显著的冠状动脉狭窄会使变异性心绞痛(VAP)的预后变差。然而,各种因素对无显著动脉狭窄患者预后的影响尚未明确。

方法与结果

我们对1248例连续的无冠状动脉狭窄≥50%的VAP患者进行了调查。平均随访时间为11.7±6.8年。91例患者(7.3%)发生了不稳定型心绞痛、急性心肌梗死或伴有新的冠状动脉狭窄的劳力性心绞痛。30例患者(2.4%)猝死。多因素分析显示,即使冠状动脉狭窄程度轻微,也会使预后变差(P = 0.027;比值比,1.66;95%置信区间,1.06 - 2.61)。此外,不同寻常的是,女性患者的预后优于男性患者(P = 0.007;比值比,0.35;95%置信区间,0.16 - 0.75)。其他因素,如高脂血症、糖尿病和高血压,并不影响预后。

结论

在VAP患者中,即使冠状动脉狭窄程度较轻,也与较差的预后相关。

相似文献

1
Mild stenosis makes prognosis of vasospastic angina worse.轻度狭窄会使血管痉挛性心绞痛的预后更差。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283402313.
2
Effects of benidipine and some other calcium channel blockers on the prognosis of patients with vasospastic angina. Cohort study with evaluation of the ergonovine coronary spasm induction test.贝尼地平及其他一些钙通道阻滞剂对变异性心绞痛患者预后的影响。采用麦角新碱冠状动脉痉挛诱发试验评估的队列研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57(9):573-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296652.
3
Prompt relief of vasospastic angina by calcium antagonists.钙拮抗剂可迅速缓解血管痉挛性心绞痛。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1987 Apr;25(4):175-7.
4
Clinical implications of low-dose aspirin on vasospastic angina patients without significant coronary artery stenosis; a propensity score-matched analysis.低剂量阿司匹林对无明显冠状动脉狭窄的血管痉挛性心绞痛患者的临床影响;一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.195. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
[Cardiac events in vasospastic angina: site and morphology of coronary artery spasm is related to the long-term prognosis of vasospastic angina].[变异性心绞痛的心脏事件:冠状动脉痉挛的部位和形态与变异性心绞痛的长期预后相关]
J Cardiol. 1999 Apr;33(4):191-9.
6
Long-term cardiac events in men and women with angina at rest and transient ST segment elevation.静息型心绞痛和短暂性ST段抬高的男性和女性的长期心脏事件。
Heart. 2007 Mar;93(3):379-80. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.105080.
7
[Myocardial infarction in patient with variant angina].[变异型心绞痛患者发生心肌梗死]
Kardiol Pol. 2004 Aug;61(8):147-50; discussion 150.
8
[Hyperventilation test: a noninvasive screening test for coronary vasospasm].[过度通气试验:一种用于冠状动脉痉挛的无创筛查试验]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995 Apr 22;125(16):777-85.
9
Long-term prognosis of vasospastic angina without significant atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.无显著动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉疾病的血管痉挛性心绞痛的长期预后
Jpn Heart J. 1987 Nov;28(6):841-9. doi: 10.1536/ihj.28.841.
10
Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group.止血因素与心绞痛患者心肌梗死或猝死风险。欧洲血栓形成与残疾协同行动心绞痛研究组
N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 9;332(10):635-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503093321003.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Evidence on Long-Term Prognostic Factors in Vasospastic Angina.血管痉挛性心绞痛长期预后因素的当前证据
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):4270. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184270.
2
Effect of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis on Prognosis in Patients with Vasospastic Angina: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.严重冠状动脉狭窄对变异性心绞痛患者预后的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3341. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153341.
3
Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.
急诊科合理与适宜医疗指南(GRACE):急诊科反复出现的低危胸痛。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;28(7):718-744. doi: 10.1111/acem.14296. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
4
Incidence and factors associated with mortality in 2,476 patients with variant angina in Korea.韩国 2,476 例变异性心绞痛患者的死亡率及相关因素分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:46031. doi: 10.1038/srep46031.
5
Moderate vasomotor response to acetylcholine provocation test as an indicator of long-term prognosis.乙酰胆碱激发试验的中度血管运动反应作为长期预后的指标。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1943-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0827-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Provocative testing for coronary reactivity and spasm.冠状动脉反应性和痉挛的激发试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 21;63(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.038. Epub 2013 Nov 6.