Suppr超能文献

伤寒患者针对伤寒沙门氏菌脂多糖和蛋白质抗原的抗体测定。

Determination of antibody from typhoid patients against lipopolysaccharide and protein antigens of Salmonella typhi.

作者信息

Mekara Y, Maneekarn N, Vithayasai V, Makonkawkeyoon S

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1990 Dec;8(2):95-101.

PMID:2091664
Abstract

Although the Widal test is simple, inexpensive and the most widely used for serodiagnosis of typhoid fever, the sensitivity and specificity of the test is sometimes doubtful. In this study, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed for the detection of serum IgG and IgM antibodies to protein and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigens of Salmonella typhi which was compared with the Widal test in various groups of subjects. In typhoid patients with hemocultures positive for S. typhi (TP group), ELISA positivity was found on 100% for IgG antiprotein, 94.44% for IgG anti-LPS and 88.89% for IgM to both the protein and LPS antigens. In contrast, the Widal test was positive in only 61.11% for anti-O and 83.33% for anti-H antibodies. In healthy control subjects (HC group), only 5% of serum samples were positive for IgG anti-protein and none was positive for IgG anti-LPS or IgM to either the protein or LPS. In contrast, the Widal test was positive in 7.5% of HC group for anti-O and 17.5% for anti-H antibodies. In blood bank donors (BB group), both ELISA and Widal tests were positive in 23-40% of sera. Since the hospital records of BB group were incomplete. It might be possible that some of these subjects had recently been infected with S. typhi. Our data indicate that the standard Widal test was associated with false negative reactions in 16-39% of blood culture positive subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

虽然肥达试验简单、廉价且是用于伤寒血清学诊断最广泛的方法,但该试验的敏感性和特异性有时存疑。在本研究中,开发了一种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法,用于检测伤寒沙门菌蛋白质和脂多糖(LPS)抗原的血清IgG和IgM抗体,并在不同组受试者中与肥达试验进行比较。在血培养伤寒沙门菌阳性的伤寒患者(TP组)中,ELISA检测IgG抗蛋白质阳性率为100%,IgG抗LPS阳性率为94.44%,IgM抗蛋白质和抗LPS抗原阳性率为88.89%。相比之下,肥达试验抗O抗体阳性率仅为61.11%,抗H抗体阳性率为83.33%。在健康对照受试者(HC组)中,仅5%的血清样本IgG抗蛋白质阳性,IgG抗LPS或IgM抗蛋白质及抗LPS均无阳性。相比之下,肥达试验HC组抗O抗体阳性率为7.5%,抗H抗体阳性率为17.5%。在血库供血者(BB组)中,ELISA和肥达试验在23% - 40%的血清中呈阳性。由于BB组的医院记录不完整,有可能这些受试者中有一些最近感染了伤寒沙门菌。我们的数据表明,标准肥达试验在16% - 39%的血培养阳性受试者中出现假阴性反应。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验