National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Oct;126(4):747-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.024.
PCR studies have demonstrated evidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the lower airways of patients with asthma.
To test the hypothesis that clarithromycin would improve asthma control in individuals with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma that was not well controlled despite treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.
Adults with an Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥1.5 after a 4-week period of treatment with fluticasone propionate were entered into a PCR-stratified randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of 16 weeks of either clarithromycin or placebo, added to fluticasone, on asthma control in individuals with or without lower airway PCR evidence of M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae.
A total of 92 participants were randomized. Twelve (13%) subjects demonstrated PCR evidence of M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae in endobronchial biopsies; 80 were PCR-negative for both organisms. In PCR-positive participants, clarithromycin yielded a 0.4 ± 0.4 unit improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire score, with a 0.1 ± 0.3 unit improvement in those allocated to placebo. This between-group difference of 0.3 ± 0.5 (P = .6) was neither clinically nor statistically significant. In PCR-negative participants, a nonsignificant between-group difference of 0.2 ± 0.2 units (P = .3) was observed. Clarithromycin did not improve lung function or airway inflammation but did improve airway hyperresponsiveness, increasing the methacholine PC(20) by 1.2 ± 0.5 doubling doses (P = .02) in the study population.
Adding clarithromycin to fluticasone in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma that was suboptimally controlled by low-dose inhaled corticosteroids alone did not further improve asthma control. Although there was an improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness with clarithromycin, this benefit was not accompanied by improvements in other secondary outcomes.
PCR 研究已经在哮喘患者的下呼吸道中发现了肺炎支原体和肺炎衣原体的证据。
检测克拉霉素是否能改善轻度至中度持续性哮喘患者的哮喘控制,这些患者在接受低剂量吸入皮质激素治疗后仍未得到很好的控制。
在接受丙酸氟替卡松治疗 4 周后,哮喘控制问卷(Asthma Control Questionnaire,ACQ)评分≥1.5 的成年人进入 PCR 分层随机对照试验,以评估在存在或不存在下呼吸道 PCR 证据的肺炎支原体或肺炎衣原体的情况下,16 周的克拉霉素或安慰剂添加到氟替卡松治疗对哮喘控制的影响。
共 92 名参与者被随机分组。12 名(13%)患者的支气管活检中存在 PCR 证据表明肺炎支原体或肺炎衣原体;80 名患者这两种病原体均为 PCR 阴性。在 PCR 阳性的参与者中,克拉霉素使 ACQ 评分提高了 0.4±0.4 分,而分配到安慰剂组的患者则提高了 0.1±0.3 分。两组之间的差异为 0.3±0.5(P=0.6),无论是临床还是统计学上均无显著性。在 PCR 阴性的参与者中,观察到两组之间的差异为 0.2±0.2 单位(P=0.3),无显著性差异。克拉霉素并未改善肺功能或气道炎症,但确实改善了气道高反应性,使研究人群的乙酰甲胆碱 PC(20)增加了 1.2±0.5 倍剂量(P=0.02)。
在因低剂量吸入皮质激素单独治疗而未得到充分控制的轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成年人中,将克拉霉素添加到氟替卡松中并不能进一步改善哮喘控制。尽管克拉霉素改善了气道高反应性,但这种益处并没有伴随其他次要结局的改善。