Kose Ozkan, Celiktas Mustafa, Kisin Bulent, Ozyurek Selahattin, Yigit Seyhmus
Diyarbakır State Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Foot Ankle Spec. 2011 Feb;4(1):14-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640010382293. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
Biomechanical imbalance between the hallux and the second toe and external compression of the lateral nail fold are proposed as the main reasons for ingrown toenail. Therefore, any anatomical predisposition facilitating this compression may play a role in the occurrence of ingrown toenail. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between forefoot alignment and ingrown toenail. The authors retrospectively reviewed radiographs of 81 patients with ingrown toenails and compared them with 100 healthy subjects regarding forefoot alignment. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and interphalangeal angle (IPA) were measured, and feet were classified according to digital formula as Egyptian, Greek, and square. The mean HVA was 14.5° ± 5.0° in the case group and 13.2° ± 5.9° in the control group. The mean IMA was 9.1° ± 2.5° in the case group and 8.6° ± 3.1° in the control group. The mean IPA was 11.9° ± 4.1° in the case group and 12.0° ± 5.1° in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding HVA, IMA, or IPA (P = .123, P = .198, and P = .925, respectively). The distribution of foot types between groups was also similar (P = .967). This study has failed to demonstrate any abnormality in forefoot alignment in patients with symptomatic ingrowing toenails, and it is suggested that treatment should not be based on the correction of the anatomy if no abnormality exists.
拇趾与第二趾之间的生物力学失衡以及外侧甲襞的外部压迫被认为是嵌甲的主要原因。因此,任何有利于这种压迫的解剖学易感性可能在嵌甲的发生中起作用。本研究的目的是调查前足排列与嵌甲之间的关系。作者回顾性分析了81例嵌甲患者的X线片,并与100名健康受试者的前足排列情况进行比较。测量了拇外翻角(HVA)、跖间角(IMA)和趾间角(IPA),并根据足趾形态将足部分为埃及型、希腊型和方型。病例组的平均HVA为14.5°±5.0°,对照组为13.2°±5.9°。病例组的平均IMA为9.1°±2.5°,对照组为8.6°±3.1°。病例组的平均IPA为11.9°±4.1°,对照组为12.0°±5.1°。两组之间在HVA、IMA或IPA方面无统计学显著差异(P分别为0.123、0.198和0.925)。两组之间的足型分布也相似(P = 0.967)。本研究未能证明有症状的嵌甲患者前足排列存在任何异常,并且建议如果不存在异常,治疗不应基于解剖结构的矫正。