• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯使用聚醚醚酮 cage 与髂嵴自体骨移植治疗颈椎退行性疾病的比较。

Comparison of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages and iliac crest autografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jan;153(1):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0821-4. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-010-0821-4
PMID:20924769
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases. This retrospective study was designed to analyze and compare the efficacy and outcomes of anterior cervical fusion using stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous iliac crest grafts with the anterior cervical plating system.

METHODS

A total of 72 consecutive patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc diseases treated with ACDF from June 2005 to Dec 2008 were enrolled in the study. Patients in group A (40 patients, 64 segments) had anterior interbody fusion with stand-alone PEEK cages and patients in group B (32 patients, 51 segments) with autogenous iliac crest graft combined with anterior plate fixation. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system; cervical lordosis, intervertebral height, and cervical fusion status were assessed on X-ray and computed tomography.

FINDINGS

The mean follow-up period was 17.3 months in the stand-alone cage group and 23.2 months in the autologous iliac crest graft group. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were much less than those in group B (p < 0.05). All the patients in both groups got complete interbody fusion. Postoperative JOA scores in both group A and group B were more than the preoperative ones with significant differences, and the improvement rate of JOA scores had no statistical differences between group A and group B. Postoperative cervical physiological curvature and intervertebral height in both groups were better than the preoperative ones with statistical significances.

CONCLUSIONS

The stand-alone PEEK cage is a good substitute for fusion in patients with cervical disc disease; it can effectively restore the cervical physiological curvature and the intervertebral height, facilitate radiological follow-up, cause few complications, and leads to satisfactory outcomes.

摘要

背景

颈椎前路减压融合术(ACDF)是治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的一种广泛接受的手术方法。本回顾性研究旨在分析和比较使用独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼和自体髂嵴移植物与颈椎前路板系统进行颈椎前路融合的疗效和结果。

方法

2005 年 6 月至 2008 年 12 月,共纳入 72 例因颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病接受 ACDF 治疗的连续患者。A 组(40 例,64 个节段)患者采用独立 PEEK 笼行前路椎间融合,B 组(32 例,51 个节段)患者采用自体髂嵴移植联合前路板固定。记录手术时间和术中失血量。采用日本矫形协会(JOA)评分系统评估临床结果;X 线和 CT 评估颈椎曲度、椎间高度和颈椎融合情况。

结果

独立笼组的平均随访时间为 17.3 个月,自体髂嵴移植组为 23.2 个月。A 组的手术时间和术中失血量明显少于 B 组(p<0.05)。两组患者均获得完全椎间融合。两组术后 JOA 评分均高于术前,差异有统计学意义,两组间 JOA 评分改善率无统计学差异。两组术后颈椎生理曲度和椎间高度均优于术前,差异有统计学意义。

结论

独立 PEEK 笼是颈椎间盘疾病患者融合的良好替代物;它可以有效恢复颈椎生理曲度和椎间高度,便于影像学随访,并发症少,结果满意。

相似文献

1
Comparison of stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages and iliac crest autografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.单纯使用聚醚醚酮 cage 与髂嵴自体骨移植治疗颈椎退行性疾病的比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jan;153(1):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0821-4. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
2
Polyetheretherketone interbody cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts with anterior fixation for cervical disc disease.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与自体髂嵴骨移植前路固定治疗颈椎间盘疾病的比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Apr;26(2):61-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182323274.
3
Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.1级和2级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中使用椎间融合器的结果:钛笼与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼的对比
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):310-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84.
4
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.使用自锁独立聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与使用椎间融合器和钢板的ACDF治疗三级颈椎退行性脊椎病的比较:一项为期2年随访的回顾性研究
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.局部骨移植联合聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与髂骨移植在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;155:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.使用自锁独立聚醚醚酮椎间融合器进行两级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术,分别在上下椎体放置两个锚固夹。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1613-6. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages.采用椎间融合器治疗多节段颈椎融合术。
Surg Neurol. 2004 Nov;62(5):378-85, discussion 385-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.021.
8
Comparison of 3 fusion techniques in the treatment of the degenerative cervical spine disease. Is stand-alone autograft really the "gold standard?": prospective study with 2-year follow-up.三种融合技术治疗退行性颈椎病的比较。单纯自体移植物真的是“金标准”吗?:前瞻性研究,随访 2 年。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1645-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825413fe.
9
Comparison of the clinical and radiologic outcomes obtained with single- versus two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion using stand-alone PEEK cages filled with allograft.使用填充同种异体骨的独立聚醚醚酮椎间融合器进行单节段与双节段颈椎前路减压融合术的临床及影像学结果比较。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Mar;158(3):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2692-1. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Multilevel cervical fusion without plates, screws or autogenous iliac crest bone graft.不使用钢板、螺钉或自体髂嵴骨移植的多级颈椎融合术。
J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Aug;14(8):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.02.026. Epub 2007 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative MRI-based endplate quality: a novel tool for predicting cage subsidence after anterior cervical spine surgery.基于术前 MRI 的终板质量:一种预测前路颈椎手术后 cage 下沉的新工具。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 16;19(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04716-w.
2
Comparison of Different Osteobiologics in Terms of Imaging Modalities and Time Frames for Fusion Assessment in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中不同骨生物材料在融合评估的影像学方式及时间框架方面的比较:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):141S-162S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157312.
3
The fusion rates at different times of cortical iliac crest autograft or allograft compared with cages after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后,皮质髂嵴自体骨移植或同种异体骨移植与椎间融合器在不同时间的融合率比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1148-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08118-0. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
Is 3D-printed Titanium cage a reliable option for 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in treating degenerative cervical spondylosis?3D打印钛笼是三级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗退行性颈椎病的可靠选择吗?
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 17;10:1096080. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1096080. eCollection 2023.
5
Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: a systematic review.影响前路颈椎椎体次全切融合术和椎间盘切除术 cage 沉降的因素:系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):957-968. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07530-w. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
6
Risk Factors for Dysphagia after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with the Zero-P implant system: A Study with Minimum of 2 Years Follow-up.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(Zero-P 植入系统)后吞咽困难的风险因素:一项至少 2 年随访的研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):149-156. doi: 10.1111/os.13170. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
7
The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.单纯使用聚醚醚酮椎间融合器行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的疗效。
Int Orthop. 2021 Jan;45(1):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04760-1. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Safety and Efficacy of the VariLift-C® Cervical Standalone Interbody Fusion Device with Emphasis on Multiple-level and Prior Fusion Cases.VariLift-C® 颈椎独立椎间融合器的安全性和有效性,重点关注多节段和既往融合病例
Cureus. 2019 Oct 10;11(10):e5885. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5885.
9
Correlation of Anterior Interbody Graft Choice With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cervical Spine Trauma.颈椎创伤前路椎间植骨选择与患者报告结局的相关性
Global Spine J. 2019 Oct;9(7):735-742. doi: 10.1177/2192568219828720. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术后骨融合的评估:系统文献回顾。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb;28(2):386-399. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5820-9. Epub 2018 Nov 17.