Suppr超能文献

局部骨移植联合聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与髂骨移植在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的比较。

A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

作者信息

Liu Jia-Ming, Xiong Xu, Peng Ai-Fen, Xu Min, Chen Xuan-Yin, Long Xin-Hua, Xu Risheng, Liu Zhi-Li

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, PR China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The 94th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Nanchang 330002, PR China.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;155:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a popular procedure for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, but few studies reported the clinical outcomes of cervical local bone graft with a PEEK cage used in it. This retrospective study was performed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of using local bone graft with a PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft in ACDF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF were evaluated from January 2010 to January 2013. Twenty-nine patients received ACDF with a PEEK cage combined with cervical local bone graft (local bone group) and 31 patients received ACDF with autologous tricortical iliac bone graft (iliac bone group). The intraoperative and perioperative complications of both groups were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were taken to calculate the ratio of interbody height to the disc height and the interbody bony fusion rate. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to estimate postoperative clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 25.0±3.8months in the local bone group and 24.4±3.4months in the iliac bone group (P=0.56). Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss (P=0.17), the length of surgery was significantly less in the local bone group comparing with that of iliac bone group (P=0.01). Postoperatively, VAS scores were significantly decreased, and JOA scores were improved in both groups. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups at final follow up (P=0.45 and P=0.93). The disc space height and segmental interbody angle at the surgical segment were greater in local bone group than those in the iliac bone group (P<0.001 and P<0.001). The fusion rates were 93.1% in local bone group and 90.3% in the iliac bone group at last follow up (P=0.70). Perioperative complication rates in local bone group and iliac bone groups were 6.8% and 29%, respectively (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, patients receiving ACDF with local bone graft combined with a PEEK cage had significant shorter operation time, lower perioperative complications rate, and better radiological results comparing with those with an iliac bone graft alone. It seems that the local bone graft with a PEEK cage appears to be a safe alternative to the iliac bone graft for ACDF.

摘要

目的

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是治疗脊髓型颈椎病患者的常用手术,但很少有研究报道使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器并结合颈椎局部植骨的临床疗效。本回顾性研究旨在比较ACDF中使用局部植骨联合PEEK椎间融合器与髂骨植骨的临床和影像学结果。

患者与方法

对2010年1月至2013年1月期间连续接受ACDF手术的60例患者进行评估。29例患者接受ACDF联合PEEK椎间融合器并结合颈椎局部植骨(局部植骨组),31例患者接受ACDF联合自体三面皮质髂骨植骨(髂骨植骨组)。记录两组的术中及围手术期并发症。拍摄术前和术后X线片,计算椎间高度与椎间盘高度的比值以及椎间骨融合率。采用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后临床疗效。

结果

局部植骨组平均随访时间为25.0±3.8个月,髂骨植骨组为24.4±3.4个月(P = 0.56)。虽然两组在失血量方面无显著差异(P = 0.17),但局部植骨组的手术时间明显短于髂骨植骨组(P = 0.01)。术后,两组的VAS评分均显著降低,JOA评分均有所改善。然而,在末次随访时两组之间未发现统计学显著差异(P = 0.45和P = 0.93)。局部植骨组手术节段的椎间隙高度和节段间椎间角度大于髂骨植骨组(P<0.001和P<0.001)。末次随访时局部植骨组的融合率为93.1%,髂骨植骨组为90.3%(P = 0.70)。局部植骨组和髂骨植骨组的围手术期并发症发生率分别为6.8%和29%(P = 0.04)。

结论

基于本研究,与单纯髂骨植骨相比,接受ACDF联合局部植骨并结合PEEK椎间融合器的患者手术时间明显更短,围手术期并发症发生率更低,影像学结果更好。对于ACDF,局部植骨联合PEEK椎间融合器似乎是髂骨植骨的一种安全替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验