Sun Huiming, Zimmer Hubert D, Fu Xiaolan
State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Apr;64(4):707-29. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.511238. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
We investigated whether the expertise of a perceiver and the physical complexity of a stimulus influence consolidation of visual short-term memory (VSTM) in a S1-S2 (Stimulus 1-Stimulus 2) change detection task. Consolidation is assumed to make transient perceptual representations in VSTM more durable, and it is investigated by postexposure of a mask shortly after offset of the perceived stimulus (S1; 17 to 483 ms). We presented colours, Chinese characters, pseudocharacters, and novel symbols to novices (Germans) or experts of Chinese language (Chinese readers). Physical complexity was manipulated by the number of strokes. Unfamiliar material was remembered worse than familiar material (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). For novices the absolute VSTM performance was better for physically simple than for complex material, whereas for experts the complexity did not matter-Chinese readers memorized Chinese characters (Experiment 3). Articulatory suppression did not change these effects (Experiment 2). We always observed a strong effect of SOA, but this effect was influenced neither by physical complexity nor by expertise; only the length of the interstimulus interval between S1 and the mask was relevant. This was observed even with short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 100 ms (Experiment 2) and in comparing colours and characters (Experiment 5). However, masks impaired memory if they were presented at the locations of the to-be-memorized items, but not beside them-that is, interference was location-based (Experiment 6). We explain the effect of SOA by the assumption that it takes time to stop encoding of information presented at item locations with the offset of S1. The increasing resistance against interference by irrelevant material appears as consolidation of S1.
我们在一个S1-S2(刺激1-刺激2)变化检测任务中,研究了感知者的专业知识和刺激的物理复杂性是否会影响视觉短期记忆(VSTM)的巩固。巩固被认为会使VSTM中短暂的感知表征更持久,并且通过在感知刺激(S1;17至483毫秒)消失后不久呈现掩蔽来进行研究。我们向新手(德国人)或汉语专家(中国读者)呈现颜色、汉字、假字和新符号。通过笔画数量来操纵物理复杂性。不熟悉的材料比熟悉的材料记忆效果更差(实验1、2和3)。对于新手来说,物理简单的材料的绝对VSTM表现优于复杂材料,而对于专家来说,复杂性并不重要——中国读者能记住汉字(实验3)。发音抑制并没有改变这些效应(实验2)。我们总是观察到刺激间隔时间(SOA)有很强的效应,但这种效应既不受物理复杂性的影响,也不受专业知识的影响;只有S1和掩蔽之间的刺激间隔长度是相关的。即使在100毫秒的短刺激起始异步(SOA)情况下(实验2)以及在比较颜色和汉字时(实验5)也观察到了这一点。然而,如果掩蔽出现在要记忆项目的位置,而不是在它们旁边,那么掩蔽会损害记忆——也就是说,干扰是基于位置的(实验6)。我们通过假设S1消失时停止对项目位置呈现的信息进行编码需要时间来解释SOA的效应。对无关材料干扰的抵抗力增强表现为S1的巩固。