Department of Psychology, University of California--San Diego, LaJolla, CA 92093, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
A better understanding of the neural systems underlying impulse control is important for psychiatry. Although most impulses are motivational or emotional rather than motoric per se, it is research into the neural architecture of motor response control that has made the greatest strides. This article reviews recent developments in the cognitive neuroscience of stopping responses. Most research of this kind has focused on reactive control-that is, how subjects stop a response outright when instructed by a signal. It is argued that reactive paradigms are limited as models of control relevant to psychiatry. Instead, a set of paradigms is advocated that begins to model proactive inhibitory control-that is, how a subject prepares to stop an upcoming response tendency. Proactive inhibitory control is generated according to the goals of the subject rather than by an external signal, and it can be selectively targeted at a particular response tendency. This may have wider validity than reactive control as an experimental model for stopping inappropriate responses.
更好地理解冲动控制的神经基础对于精神病学很重要。尽管大多数冲动是动机性或情感性的,而不是运动性的,但正是对运动反应控制的神经结构的研究取得了最大的进展。本文综述了停止反应的认知神经科学的最新进展。这类研究大多集中在反应控制上,即当被信号指示时,主体如何直接停止反应。有人认为,反应性范式作为与精神病学相关的控制模型存在局限性。相反,提倡使用一组范式来开始模拟主动抑制控制,即主体如何准备停止即将到来的反应趋势。主动抑制控制是根据主体的目标而不是外部信号产生的,并且可以针对特定的反应趋势进行有选择的靶向。与反应控制相比,作为停止不适当反应的实验模型,主动抑制控制具有更广泛的有效性。