Otte Branden T, Striemer Christopher L
Department of Psychology, MacEwan University, 10700- 104 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4S2, Canada.
Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):182. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07126-4.
Previous research has demonstrated that the dorsal visual stream is able to execute rapid online movement corrections to sudden changes in target position. This "automatic pilot" can operate in the absence of visual awareness, and even under circumstances where participants are instructed to not correct their movements. In the current study, we examined the extent to which these "automatic" corrections might be related to individual differences in executive function. To examine this, healthy adult participants (n = 80) completed two versions of the automatic pilot task on a touch screen: (1) a "Correct" condition in which participants were instructed to correct their movement to the new target location on jump trials, and (2) an "Ignore" condition in which participants were told to ignore any target jumps, and point to the initial target location. In addition to completing these two versions of the automatic pilot task, participants also completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), in which they were asked to respond when a number was presented, except for the number 3. Finally, participants completed self-report questionnaires indexing executive attention, impulsivity, and executive function including the Adult ADHD Self Report Scale (ASRS), the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), and the Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A).Our results indicated that, similar to previous research, participants made significantly more corrections to target jumps in the "Correct" condition, compared to the "Ignore" condition. Importantly, "automatic" unintended corrections in the "Ignore" condition were significantly correlated with poorer scores on the ASRS, the CFQ and the BRIEF-A. However, unintended corrections were not correlated with errors or reaction times on the SART. These results suggest that the automatic pilot task is sensitive to self-reported individual differences in executive function, and may be useful as a visuomotor measure of response inhibition and cognitive control in both healthy and clinical populations.
先前的研究表明,背侧视觉通路能够对目标位置的突然变化进行快速的在线运动校正。这种“自动驾驶仪”可以在没有视觉意识的情况下运行,甚至在参与者被指示不要校正其动作的情况下也能运行。在当前的研究中,我们考察了这些“自动”校正可能与执行功能的个体差异相关的程度。为了检验这一点,健康的成年参与者(n = 80)在触摸屏上完成了两个版本的自动驾驶任务:(1)“校正”条件,即指示参与者在跳跃试验中校正其向新目标位置的动作;(2)“忽略”条件,即告诉参与者忽略任何目标跳跃,并指向初始目标位置。除了完成这两个版本的自动驾驶任务外,参与者还完成了持续注意力反应任务(SART),在该任务中,要求他们在呈现数字时做出反应,但数字3除外。最后,参与者完成了索引执行注意力、冲动性和执行功能的自我报告问卷,包括成人注意力缺陷多动障碍自我报告量表(ASRS)、认知失误问卷(CFQ)和成人执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF - A)。我们的结果表明,与先前的研究相似,与“忽略”条件相比,参与者在“校正”条件下对目标跳跃的校正明显更多。重要的是,“忽略”条件下的“自动”非预期校正与ASRS、CFQ和BRIEF - A上较差的分数显著相关。然而,非预期校正与SART上的错误或反应时间无关。这些结果表明,自动驾驶任务对执行功能的自我报告个体差异敏感,并且可能作为健康和临床人群中反应抑制和认知控制的视觉运动测量方法有用。