Suppr超能文献

尽管观察者之间对 QRS 融合存在分歧,但在心室超速起搏时重置标准可成功区分顺向型折返性心动过速和房室结折返性心动过速。

Resetting criteria during ventricular overdrive pacing successfully differentiate orthodromic reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia despite interobserver disagreement concerning QRS fusion.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jan;8(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.089. Epub 2010 Oct 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The beginning of ventricular overdrive pacing (VOP) during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) accurately distinguishes orthodromic reentrant tachycardia (ORT) from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) even when pacing terminates tachycardia. Tachycardia resetting most often occurs during this transition zone (TZ) of QRS fusion in ORT and after this TZ in AVNRT. The end of the TZ is marked by the first beat with a stable QRS morphology but is a subjective assessment. Disagreement concerning this beat may change tachycardia diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver agreement for identifying the TZ and whether disagreement affected diagnosis.

METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with inducible ORT and AVNRT were included. Resetting of tachycardia was evaluated by (1) atrial timing perturbation and (2) fixed stimulation-atrial activation timing (SA). Two blinded observers identified the end of the TZ and used the two resetting criteria to establish a diagnosis. Diagnostic results were compared with standard criteria for SVT diagnosis. The diagnosis was considered correct if both electrophysiologists' TZ assessment resulted in a correct diagnosis.

RESULTS

Agreement on the TZ occurred in 80% (148/186) of VOP trains. In ORT patients, tachycardia resetting occurred during the TZ and correctly diagnosed ORT based on atrial timing perturbation and fixed SA in 91% and 98% of VOP trains, respectively. In AVNRT patients, tachycardia resetting occurred after the TZ and correctly diagnosed AVNRT based on atrial timing perturbation and fixed SA in 93% and 94% of VOP trains, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Resetting criteria used during the VOP TZ accurately differentiate between ORT and AVNRT despite interobserver disagreement concerning identification of the TZ.

摘要

背景

室上性心动过速(SVT)时起始的心室超速起搏(VOP)可准确区分顺向型房室折返性心动过速(ORT)和房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT),即使起搏终止心动过速。在 ORT 中,QRS 融合的过渡区(TZ)和 AVNRT 中的该 TZ 之后,心动过速重置最常发生。TZ 的结束由具有稳定 QRS 形态的第一心搏标记,但这是一种主观评估。关于这一心搏的分歧可能改变心动过速的诊断。

目的

本研究旨在评估识别 TZ 的观察者间一致性,以及分歧是否影响诊断。

方法

连续纳入 79 例可诱发 ORT 和 AVNRT 的患者。通过(1)心房计时干扰和(2)固定刺激-心房激活计时(SA)评估心动过速的重置。两名盲法观察者识别 TZ 的结束,并使用两种重置标准建立诊断。诊断结果与 SVT 诊断的标准标准进行比较。如果两位电生理学家的 TZ 评估均导致正确诊断,则认为诊断正确。

结果

在 80%(148/186)的 VOP 刺激中,在 TZ 上达成了关于 TZ 的一致意见。在 ORT 患者中,心动过速重置发生在 TZ 期间,根据心房计时干扰和固定 SA,分别在 91%和 98%的 VOP 刺激中正确诊断 ORT。在 AVNRT 患者中,心动过速重置发生在 TZ 之后,根据心房计时干扰和固定 SA,分别在 93%和 94%的 VOP 刺激中正确诊断 AVNRT。

结论

尽管在识别 TZ 方面存在观察者间的分歧,但在 VOP TZ 期间使用的重置标准可准确区分 ORT 和 AVNRT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验