Suppr超能文献

采用逆行抽吸减压(RSD)技术治疗大型和巨大颈内动脉动脉瘤的显微外科治疗结果:92 例患者系列。

Results of microsurgical treatment of large and giant ICA aneurysms using the retrograde suction decompression (RSD) technique: series of 92 patients.

机构信息

Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;73(6):683-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical treatment of large and giant paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms often requires the use of the retrograde suction decompression (RSD) technique to facilitate clipping. Surgical results, functional outcomes at discharge, and technique limitations based on single institution series are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2009, eighty-three consecutive patients (19 to 68 years, mean 45.5 ± 9.9 years), predominantly women (69 women and 14 men) with large (23 patients, 27.7%) or giant (60 patients, 72.3%) paraclinoid aneurysms were surgically treated with the RSD technique performed by the neck route (62 patients, 74.4%) or later on, by endovascular means (21 patients, 25.3%). Patients were admitted after hemorrhage (48 patients, 57.9%), pseudotumor course (28 patients, 33.7%), mixed symptoms (5 patients, 6%), or asymptomatic (2 patients, 2.4%).

RESULTS

In most RSD surgeries (90.4%) aneurysms were successfully excluded: neck was clipped in 57 patients (68.7%) or clipping with ICA reconstruction was achieved in 18 patients (21.7%). In six patients aneurysms were wrapped with glue (7.2%), trapped in one patient (1.2%), and in one patient, ICA balloon deconstruction was performed (1.2%). Good or excellent results (Glasgow Outcome Scale scores 4-5) at discharge were achieved in 69 patients (83.1%), 11 patients (13.3%) remained severely disabled (Glasgow Outcome Scale 3), and 3 patients died (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical clipping with the RSD method remains a treatment of choice with acceptable outcomes for patients not amenable for endovascular treatment.

摘要

背景

显微外科治疗大型和巨大颈内动脉(ICA)旁动脉瘤常需要使用逆行抽吸减压(RSD)技术来辅助夹闭。本文报告了单中心系列研究中的手术结果、出院时的功能结果和技术局限性。

材料和方法

1996 年至 2009 年,83 例连续患者(19 至 68 岁,平均 45.5 ± 9.9 岁),主要为女性(69 例女性和 14 例男性),患有大型(23 例,27.7%)或巨大(60 例,72.3%)颈内动脉旁动脉瘤,采用颈内途径的 RSD 技术(62 例,74.4%)或随后的血管内方法(21 例,25.3%)进行手术治疗。患者因出血(48 例,57.9%)、假性肿瘤病程(28 例,33.7%)、混合症状(5 例,6%)或无症状(2 例,2.4%)而入院。

结果

在大多数 RSD 手术中(90.4%)成功地排除了动脉瘤:57 例患者(68.7%)颈部夹闭,18 例患者(21.7%)ICA 重建夹闭。6 例患者用胶水包裹动脉瘤(7.2%),1 例患者被夹闭(1.2%),1 例患者行 ICA 球囊拆除术(1.2%)。69 例患者(83.1%)出院时获得良好或优秀结果(格拉斯哥结局量表评分 4-5),11 例患者(13.3%)仍严重残疾(格拉斯哥结局量表 3),3 例患者死亡(3.6%)。

结论

对于不适合血管内治疗的患者,RSD 方法的手术夹闭仍然是一种可接受的治疗选择,具有良好的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验