Suppr超能文献

基于大脑前循环大型和巨大动脉瘤缺血过度保护的手术方案的结果。

The outcome of a surgical protocol based on ischemia overprotection in large and giant aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation.

作者信息

Imai Hideaki, Watanabe Katsushige, Miyagishima Takaaki, Yoshimoto Yuhei, Kin Taichi, Nakatomi Hirofumi, Saito Nobuhito

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Jul;39(3):505-17. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0721-z. Epub 2016 May 6.

Abstract

Aiming to define the optimal treatment of large and giant aneurysms (LGAs) in the anterior circulation, we present our surgical protocol and patient outcome. A series of 42 patients with intracavernous LGAs (n = 16), paraclinoid (C2) LGAs (n = 17), and peripheral (middle cerebral artery-MCA or anterior cerebral artery-ACA) LGAs (n = 9) were treated after bypass under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Preoperatively, three categories of ischemic tolerance during internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion were defined on conventional angiography: optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals. Accordingly, three types of bypass: low flow (LFB), middle flow (MFB) and high flow (HFB) were applied for the cases with optimal, suboptimal, and insufficient collaterals, respectively. Outcome was evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). All patients had excellent GOS score except one, who suffered a major ischemic stroke immediately after surgery for a paraclinoid lesion. Forty-one patients were followed up for 87.1 ± 40.1 months (range 13-144 months). Intracavernous LGAs were all treated by proximal occlusion with bypass surgery. Of paraclinoid LGA patients, 15 patients had direct clipping under suction decompression and other 2 patients with recurrent aneurysms had ICA (C2) proximal clipping with HFB. MEP monitoring guided for temporary clipping time and clip repositioning, observing significant MEP changes for up to 6 min duration. Of 9 peripheral LGAs patients 7 MCA LGAs had reconstructive clipping (n = 4) or trapping (n = 3) with bypass including LFB in 3 cases, MFB in 1 and HFB in 1. Two ACA LGAs had clipping (n = 1) or trapping (n = 1) with A3-A3 bypass. The applied protocol provided excellent results in intracavernous, paraclinoid, and peripheral thrombosed LGAs of the anterior circulation.

摘要

为了确定前循环中大型和巨大动脉瘤(LGA)的最佳治疗方法,我们介绍了我们的手术方案和患者预后情况。42例患有海绵窦内LGA(n = 16)、床突旁(C2)LGA(n = 17)和周围型(大脑中动脉-MCA或大脑前动脉-ACA)LGA(n = 9)的患者在运动诱发电位(MEP)监测下进行搭桥手术后接受治疗。术前,在传统血管造影上定义了颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞期间的三类缺血耐受性:最佳、次优和侧支循环不足。相应地,分别对侧支循环最佳、次优和不足的病例应用了三种类型的搭桥:低流量(LFB)、中流量(MFB)和高流量(HFB)。通过格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评估预后。除1例因床突旁病变术后立即发生严重缺血性卒中外,所有患者的GOS评分均为优良。41例患者接受了87.1±40.1个月(范围13 - 144个月)的随访。海绵窦内LGA均通过近端闭塞并搭桥手术治疗。在床突旁LGA患者中,15例在吸引减压下进行直接夹闭,另外2例复发性动脉瘤患者通过HFB进行ICA(C2)近端夹闭。MEP监测指导临时夹闭时间和夹子重新定位,观察到持续长达6分钟的显著MEP变化。在9例周围型LGA患者中,7例MCA LGA患者进行了重建夹闭(n = 4)或包裹术(n = 3)并搭桥,其中3例采用LFB,1例采用MFB,1例采用HFB。2例ACA LGA患者采用A3 - A3搭桥进行夹闭(n = 1)或包裹术(n = 1)。所应用的方案在前循环的海绵窦内、床突旁和周围血栓形成的LGA中取得了优异的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3621/4904025/1267b369fb92/10143_2016_721_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验