Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):134-45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092373. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
To calculate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at presentation.
A systematic search for relevant studies was performed of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodologic quality of each study by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The inclusion criteria were met by 50 studies. Heterogeneity was tested, and the presence of publication bias was visually assessed (by using a funnel plot). A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed on a per-patient level.
Concerning sensitivity, the selected studies showed moderate heterogeneity. For specificity, low heterogeneity was observed. Moderate-heterogeneity studies that investigated only sensitivity or specificity were excluded from the pooled analyses by using a bivariate random effects model. The majority of the studies (n = 30) used a four-detector row CT scanner. The studies had good methodologic quality. Pooled sensitivity was 98% (95% CI: 97%, 99%), and pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI: 97%, 100%). Potential sources of variability among the studies were variations in the methodologic features (quality score), CT examination procedure (number of rows on the multidetector CT scanner), the standard of reference used, and the prevalence of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. There was evidence for publication bias, which may have led to overestimation of the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography.
Multidetector CT angiography can be used as a primary examination tool in the diagnostic work-up of patients with SAH.
计算在急性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者就诊时,计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影术(CTA)诊断脑动脉瘤的敏感性和特异性。
对 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统检索,以寻找相关研究。两名审阅者使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool)独立评估了每项研究的方法学质量。符合纳入标准的有 50 项研究。对各项研究的敏感性和特异性进行了报告,对其进行了异质性检验,并通过漏斗图进行了发表偏倚的视觉评估。在患者层面上,对每一项研究的敏感性和特异性报告值进行了 95%置信区间(Confidence Intervals,CI)的荟萃分析。
在敏感性方面,所选研究存在中度异质性。特异性方面,观察到低度异质性。通过使用双变量随机效应模型,排除了仅针对敏感性或特异性进行研究的中度异质性研究,以进行汇总分析。大多数研究(n=30)使用了四排探测器 CT 扫描仪。研究方法学质量良好。汇总敏感性为 98%(95%CI:97%,99%),汇总特异性为 100%(95%CI:97%,100%)。研究之间存在变异性的潜在来源是方法学特征(质量评分)、CT 检查程序(多排 CT 扫描仪的排数)、参考标准和破裂颅内动脉瘤的发生率等方面的差异。存在发表偏倚的证据,这可能导致了对 CTA 诊断准确性的高估。
多排 CT 血管造影术可以作为 SAH 患者诊断性检查的首选工具。