• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场时间和穿透性创伤后的结果:一项观察性研究。

On-scene time and outcome after penetrating trauma: an observational study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, 4231, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Sep;28(9):797-801. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.097535. Epub 2010 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2010.097535
PMID:20935332
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversies exist as to whether one should rely on the 'scoop and run' or 'stay and play' approach in the case of penetrating trauma in the prehospital setting. Optimal prehospital care is much debated and the extent to which advanced life support (ALS) measures should be performed remains unclear. This study aimed to report the outcome of penetrating torso trauma in relation to the on-scene time and ALS procedures performed prehospitally. It was hypothesised that a longer on-scene time could predict a higher mortality after penetrating torso trauma.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of penetrating trauma patients treated by the Mobile Emergency Care Unit in Copenhagen with a 30-day follow-up. Between January 2002 and September 2009, data were prospectively registered regarding the anatomical location of the trauma, time intervals and procedures performed in the prehospital setting. Follow-up data were obtained from a national administrative database. The primary end point was 30-day survival.

RESULTS

Of the 467 patients registered, 442 (94.6%) were identified at the 30-day follow-up, of whom 40 (9%) were dead. A higher mortality was found among patients treated on-scene for more than 20 min (p=0.0001), although on-scene time was not a significant predictor of 30-day mortality in the multivariate analysis; OR 3.71, 95% CI 0.66 to 20.70 (p=0.14). The number of procedures was significantly correlated to a higher mortality in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

On-scene time might be important in penetrating trauma, and ALS procedures should not delay transport to definite care at the hospital.

摘要

背景

在院前环境中,对于穿透性创伤,究竟应该采用“ scooping and run ”还是“ stay and play ”方法存在争议。最佳的院前护理存在很大争议,高级生命支持(ALS)措施应实施到何种程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在报告与现场时间和院前实施的 ALS 程序相关的穿透性躯干创伤的结果。假设现场时间较长可能会预测穿透性躯干创伤后的死亡率更高。

方法

这是一项对哥本哈根移动急救单元治疗的穿透性创伤患者的观察性队列研究,随访时间为 30 天。在 2002 年 1 月至 2009 年 9 月期间,前瞻性地记录了有关创伤解剖位置,现场时间间隔和院前实施的程序的数据。随访数据从国家行政数据库中获得。主要终点是 30 天的生存。

结果

在登记的 467 名患者中,有 442 名(94.6%)在 30 天的随访中得到确认,其中有 40 名(9%)死亡。在现场治疗超过 20 分钟的患者中发现死亡率更高(p=0.0001),尽管在多变量分析中现场时间不是 30 天死亡率的重要预测因素;OR 3.71,95%CI 0.66 至 20.70(p=0.14)。在多变量分析中,操作次数与更高的死亡率显着相关。

结论

现场时间可能在穿透性创伤中很重要,并且 ALS 程序不应延迟转运到医院的确定性治疗。

相似文献

1
On-scene time and outcome after penetrating trauma: an observational study.现场时间和穿透性创伤后的结果:一项观察性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Sep;28(9):797-801. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.097535. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
2
Prehospital interventions for penetrating trauma victims: a prospective comparison between Advanced Life Support and Basic Life Support.院前干预对穿透性创伤患者:高级生命支持与基本生命支持的前瞻性比较。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
3
Additional evidence in support of withholding or terminating cardiopulmonary resuscitation for trauma patients in the field.支持在现场对创伤患者停止或终止心肺复苏的更多证据。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.012.
4
The association of mobile medical team involvement on on-scene times and mortality in trauma patients.移动医疗队参与对创伤患者现场救治时间及死亡率的影响
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):589-94; discussion 594. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e74858.
5
Airway management for victims of penetrating trauma: analysis of 50,000 cases.穿透性创伤受害者的气道管理:50000 例分析。
Am J Surg. 2009 Dec;198(6):863-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.013.
6
Prehospital procedures before emergency department thoracotomy: "scoop and run" saves lives.急诊室开胸术前的院前程序:“快速搬运并撤离”可挽救生命。
J Trauma. 2007 Jul;63(1):113-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31806842a1.
7
Prehospital interventions: time wasted or time saved? An observational cohort study of management in initial trauma care.院前干预:是浪费时间还是节省时间?一项关于初始创伤护理管理的观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jul;25(7):444-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052662.
8
Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS): impact on on-scene times.直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS):对现场救援时间的影响
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):258-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000240449.23201.57.
9
Adult respiratory distress syndrome among blunt and penetrating trauma patients: demographics, mortality, and resource utilization over 8 years.钝性和穿透性创伤患者中的成人呼吸窘迫综合征:8年的人口统计学、死亡率及资源利用情况
J Crit Care. 2001 Jun;16(2):47-53. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.25230.
10
On-scene intravenous line insertion adversely impacts prehospital time in rural vehicular trauma.现场静脉置管对农村车辆创伤的院前时间有不利影响。
Am Surg. 2008 Nov;74(11):1083-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing prehospital invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in critically ill patients-a prospective observational first year analysis.在危重症患者中实施院前有创动脉血压监测——一项前瞻性观察性的首年分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Sep 2;33(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01461-9.
2
Influence of on-scene time and prehospital interventions on inhospital mortality in trauma patients.现场时间及院前干预对创伤患者院内死亡率的影响。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01324-7.
3
Emergency medical services level of training is associated with mortality in trauma patients: A combined prehospital and in hospital database analysis.
急诊医疗服务培训水平与创伤患者死亡率相关:一项院前与院内数据库联合分析
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Mar 1;98(3):402-409. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004540. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
When to choose intraosseous access in prehospital trauma care: A registry-based study from the Israel Defense Forces.在院前创伤护理中何时选择骨内通路:一项来自以色列国防军的基于登记处的研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2025 Jul;28(4):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Prehospital interventions and outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest: a population-based cohort study using the Danish Helicopter Emergency Medical Services data.创伤性心搏骤停的院前干预和结局:基于丹麦直升机紧急医疗服务数据的队列研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 1;31(5):324-331. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001108. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
6
Impact of increased reimbursement for ambulance transportation on hospital acceptance in Japan: a difference-in-difference study.提高救护车运输报销对日本医院收治的影响:一项差分研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 25;13(7):e071523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071523.
7
Ketamine versus propofol for rapid sequence induction in trauma patients: a retrospective study.氯胺酮与丙泊酚用于创伤患者快速顺序诱导的回顾性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 15;29(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00948-5.
8
Comparison of pre-hospital emergency services time intervals in patients with heart attack in Arak, Iran.伊朗阿拉克的心脏病患者的院前急救服务时间间隔比较。
J Inj Violence Res. 2021 Jan;13(1):31-38. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1614. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
9
The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes.创伤系统对患者预后的影响。
Curr Probl Surg. 2021 Jan;58(1):100849. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100849. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Relationship Between Nonconveyed Cases and On-Scene Time Intervals for Emergency Medical Services.紧急医疗服务中未转运病例与现场时间间隔的关系
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 8;13:1895-1904. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S279693. eCollection 2020.