• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会知觉作为归纳和推理:群体差异化、内群体偏好和差异准确性的综合模型。

Social perception as induction and inference: an integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Loyola University of Maryland, 4501 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):66-83. doi: 10.1037/a0021051.

DOI:10.1037/a0021051
PMID:20939650
Abstract

Three general properties of social stereotypes are the perception of differences between ingroups and outgroups (intergroup differentiation), the perception of ingroups as having more desirable attributes than outgroups (ingroup favoritism), and the greater accuracy of ingroup perceptions (differential accuracy). We present and test an inductive-reasoning model that accounts for all 3 phenomena, and we explicate the relations among them. Based on empirical evidence, the model assumes that most people have a positive self-image, that they project these self-images more strongly to ingroups than to outgroups, and that their self-images are valid cues for judgments about social groups. Two minimal-group experiments using a crossed-categorization paradigm support the model and provide new evidence for underlying psychological processes.

摘要

社会刻板印象有三个普遍特征

对群体内和群体外差异的感知(群体间区分)、对群体内比群体外更具理想属性的感知(群体内偏爱)以及对群体内感知的更高准确性(差异准确性)。我们提出并测试了一个能够解释这三种现象的归纳推理模型,并详细说明了它们之间的关系。基于实证证据,该模型假设大多数人都有积极的自我形象,他们将这些自我形象更多地投射到群体内而不是群体外,并且他们的自我形象是对社会群体进行判断的有效线索。两个使用交叉分类范式的最小群体实验支持了该模型,并为潜在的心理过程提供了新的证据。

相似文献

1
Social perception as induction and inference: an integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy.社会知觉作为归纳和推理:群体差异化、内群体偏好和差异准确性的综合模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jan;100(1):66-83. doi: 10.1037/a0021051.
2
Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis.对内群体和外群体的社会投射:一项综述与元分析
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(1):32-47. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3.
3
Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?为什么人们会认为内群体在群体特征上具有同质性,而外群体在群体特征上具有同质性呢?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/0146167206293190.
4
[When "self-effacement" disappears: narratives of personal and group successes depending on an in group relationship].当“自我谦逊”消失时:基于群体内关系的个人与群体成功叙事
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2003 Aug;74(3):253-62.
5
Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts.共同内群体情境中的交叉分类
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;32(9):1204-18. doi: 10.1177/0146167206289409.
6
When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.激活多样性何时会减轻、何时会增加群体间偏见?一种内群体投射视角。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178738. eCollection 2017.
7
The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.“我们”的另一面:当外群体成员表达共同身份时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1613-26. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323600. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance.社会身份复杂性与对外群体的宽容度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;31(3):428-37. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271710.
9
Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.内隐群体元偏爱:对表现出群体内偏见的群体成员的微妙偏好。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):807-18. doi: 10.1177/0146167208315210. Epub 2008 Mar 22.
10
The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping.自我刻板印象的认知表现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;36(7):911-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167210373907. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Opposites in Reasoning Processes: Do We Use Them More Than We Think, but Less Than We Could?推理过程中的对立面:我们使用它们的频率是否比我们想象的更高,但又比我们能够达到的频率更低?
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:715696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715696. eCollection 2021.
2
Group meaningfulness and the causal direction of influence between the ingroup and the self or another individual: Evidence from the Induction-Deduction Paradigm.群体意义与内群体和自我或另一个个体之间影响的因果方向:来自归纳演绎范式的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229321. eCollection 2020.
3
Group Membership, Group Change, and Intergroup Attitudes: A Recategorization Model Based on Cognitive Consistency Principles.
群体成员身份、群体变化与群体间态度:基于认知一致性原则的重新分类模型
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 6;9:479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00479. eCollection 2018.
4
Implications for the Self Determine Benevolence and Self-Protection in Intergroup Relations.群体间关系中自我决定的仁爱与自我保护的影响。
Self Identity. 2017;16(2):171-193. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1241822. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
5
Expectations and Decisions in the Volunteer's Dilemma: Effects of Social Distance and Social Projection.志愿者困境中的期望与决策:社会距离和社会投射的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 6;7:1909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01909. eCollection 2016.
6
Social identity and youth aggressive and delinquent behaviors in a context of political violence.政治暴力背景下的社会认同与青少年攻击性行为及犯罪行为
Polit Psychol. 2013 Oct 1;34(5). doi: 10.1111/pops.12030.
7
Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes in children and adults: tests in the domain of religion.儿童和成人的内隐和外显态度模式:宗教领域的测试。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):864-79. doi: 10.1037/a0029714. Epub 2012 Aug 20.