Suppr超能文献

[针灸推拿治疗亚健康的临床研究系统评价]

[Systematic evaluation on treatment of sub-health with acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina in clinical researches].

作者信息

Tang Hong-liang, Pang Jun, Gao Li-fang, Yang Yang, Lei Long-ming, Gan Wei

机构信息

Department of Massage, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of TCM, Nanning 530023, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2010 Aug;30(8):699-704.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina massage for treatment of sub-health.

METHODS

A systematic evaluation on randomized controlled trial, quasi-randomized control trial or controlled clinical trial of treatment of sub-health with acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina was carried out according to the assessment methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTS

There are totally 9 articles and 937 subjects met the inclusion criteria and are included into the assessment system. The average quality of methodologies adopted is not so high, and with many limitations. Meta-analysis or descriptive analysis on the data collected: (1) General effect: Tuina massage therapy is better than auricular-point-pressing therapy; acupuncture is better than self health care; acupoint injection is better than intramuscular injection, Tuina is similar to Chinese herb. (2) Quality of life and pain score: Tuina is better than blank control. (3) Individual effect: the effect of Tuina massage on lassitude is better than acupuncture. (4) Effect on sleep quality index: Tuina massage is better than acupuncture.

CONCLUSION

There are not enough evidences to approve that the effect of acupuncture-moxibustion and Tuina massage on sub-health is better than that of other therapies. Therefore, more high quality randomized controlled trials with strict and scientific designation are necessary for obtaining more and better evidences.

摘要

目的

评价针灸推拿治疗亚健康的疗效。

方法

按照Cochrane协作网推荐的评估方法,对针灸推拿治疗亚健康的随机对照试验、半随机对照试验或对照临床试验进行系统评价。

结果

共有9篇文献、937例受试者符合纳入标准并纳入评价体系。所采用方法学的平均质量不高,存在诸多局限性。对收集的数据进行Meta分析或描述性分析:(1)总体疗效:推拿疗法优于耳穴压豆疗法;针刺优于自我保健;穴位注射优于肌肉注射,推拿与中药疗效相似。(2)生活质量及疼痛评分:推拿优于空白对照。(3)个体疗效:推拿对倦怠的疗效优于针刺。(4)对睡眠质量指数的影响:推拿优于针刺。

结论

尚无足够证据证实针灸推拿治疗亚健康的效果优于其他疗法。因此,需要开展更多设计严格、科学的高质量随机对照试验,以获得更多更好的证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验