Department of Dentistry, UNOPAR.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2005 Mar;13(1):15-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000100004.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII - GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials.
一种是高密度(Ketac Molar-ESPE),另一种是树脂改性水泥(Fuji VIII-GC),使用无创伤性修复治疗(ART)技术来修复恒牙的多表面窝洞。共有 60 例 ART 修复(每种材料 30 例)由两名操作人员在学龄儿童(9-16 岁)中进行。6 个月后,两名独立的检查者根据先前的 ART 研究中使用的标准评估了 59 例修复体。数据提交给 McNemar 和 Fischer 检验。治疗成功率为 98.3%。有 1 例修复体(Ketac Molar)被另一种材料替换,并记录为失败。Fuji VIII 和 Ketac Molar 的修复成功率分别为 100%和 96.6%。基线和 6 个月时修复成功率无统计学差异(p>0.05)。同样,材料、窝洞类型或操作人员之间也未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。6 个月后,ART 方法在涉及两个或更多牙面的修复中非常适用且有效。结果表明,两种材料的 ART 技术均具有良好的性能。