• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国动物园圈养哺乳动物狂犬病流行情况及咬伤处理规程的监测

Surveillance of rabies prevalence and bite protocols in captive mammals in American zoos.

作者信息

Zelepsky Jacqueline, Harrison Tara M

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Zoo Wildl Med. 2010 Sep;41(3):474-9. doi: 10.1638/2009-0229.1.

DOI:10.1638/2009-0229.1
PMID:20945646
Abstract

A national survey questionnaire was conducted in 32 zoos throughout 17 U.S. states between February and May 2008. The questionnaire consisted of six questions that evaluated rabies prevalence on zoo grounds; captive mammalian bites among zoo visitors and personnel; and the outcome of each incident. The survey was completed by zoo staff after review of their most recent bite incident reports. Rabies was documented, albeit minimally, on zoo grounds in both wild and collection animals. The information collected documented that mammalian bites occur commonly. An average of 9.1 bite incidents per zoo involving zoo visitors were reported in the last 5 yr, compared to an average of 7.5 bite incidents per zoo involving personnel within the last 5 yr. Zoo personnel had a larger variety of mammals inflicting bites of greater injury severity, with an average rating 3.83 out of 5. While victim profile and severity of the wound differed between visitor and personnel bites, the majority of bites were not reported to the local health department. Lack of reporting may be due to low rabies risk, fear of media involvement, and an unknown conclusion for the offending animal. Animals involved in reported attacks had an average quarantine of 47.5 days when the bite involved a zoo visitor versus an average quarantine of 18 days when the bite involved personnel. These results demonstrate the need for a standardized protocol following a bite incident, including cooperation with the local health department, as necessary.

摘要

2008年2月至5月期间,在美国17个州的32家动物园进行了一项全国性调查问卷。该问卷包含六个问题,评估动物园场地内的狂犬病流行情况;动物园游客和工作人员中被圈养哺乳动物咬伤的情况;以及每起事件的结果。调查由动物园工作人员在审查其最近的咬伤事件报告后完成。在动物园场地内,野生和圈养动物中均有狂犬病记录,尽管数量极少。收集到的信息表明哺乳动物咬伤事件很常见。过去5年里,平均每家动物园报告了9.1起涉及游客的咬伤事件,而过去5年里,平均每家动物园涉及工作人员的咬伤事件为7.5起。动物园工作人员遭受咬伤的哺乳动物种类更多,伤势更严重,平均评分为3.83(满分5分)。虽然游客和工作人员被咬伤的受害者特征和伤口严重程度有所不同,但大多数咬伤事件并未报告给当地卫生部门。未报告可能是由于狂犬病风险低、担心媒体介入以及肇事动物的结论不明。当咬伤涉及动物园游客时,被报告袭击事件中的动物平均隔离47.5天;当咬伤涉及工作人员时,平均隔离18天。这些结果表明,咬伤事件发生后需要一个标准化的方案,必要时包括与当地卫生部门合作。

相似文献

1
Surveillance of rabies prevalence and bite protocols in captive mammals in American zoos.美国动物园圈养哺乳动物狂犬病流行情况及咬伤处理规程的监测
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2010 Sep;41(3):474-9. doi: 10.1638/2009-0229.1.
2
Epidemiology of animal bites and rabies cases in India. A multicentric study.印度动物咬伤及狂犬病病例的流行病学。一项多中心研究。
J Commun Dis. 2008 Mar;40(1):27-36.
3
Animal bites, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年美国武装部队动物咬伤情况(现役和后备役人员)
MSMR. 2011 Sep;18(9):12-5.
4
An evaluation of rabies vaccination rates among canines and felines involved in biting incidents within the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health Department.对惠灵顿-达弗林-圭尔夫公共卫生部门辖区内涉及咬人事件的犬类和猫类动物的狂犬病疫苗接种率进行评估。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Nov;61(7):499-508. doi: 10.1111/zph.12101. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Potential rabies exposures in a Virginia county.弗吉尼亚州一个县潜在的狂犬病暴露情况。
Public Health Rep. 1998 May-Jun;113(3):258-62.
6
Incidence of dog bite injuries and clinical rabies in a tertiary health care institution: a 10-year retrospective study.一家三级医疗机构中犬咬伤和临床狂犬病的发病率:一项10年回顾性研究。
Ann Afr Med. 2012 Apr-Jun;11(2):108-11. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.93534.
7
The epidemiology of animal bite injuries in Uganda and projections of the burden of rabies.乌干达动物咬伤伤害的流行病学及狂犬病负担预测。
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Aug;10(8):790-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01447.x.
8
Animal bite and rabies postexposure prophylaxis reporting--United States, 2013.2013年美国动物咬伤及狂犬病暴露后预防报告
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):E24-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000125.
9
Compendium of animal rabies prevention and control, 2011.《2011年动物狂犬病防控纲要》
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 Sep 1;239(5):609-17. doi: 10.2460/javma.239.5.609.
10
An epidemiological study of animal bites in India: results of a WHO sponsored national multi-centric rabies survey.印度动物咬伤的流行病学研究:世界卫生组织赞助的全国多中心狂犬病调查结果
J Commun Dis. 2006 Mar;38(1):32-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Challenge of Lyssavirus Infections in Domestic and Other Animals: A Mix of Virological Confusion, Consternation, Chagrin, and Curiosity.家猫和其他动物感染狂犬病病毒的挑战:病毒学上的困惑、惊愕、懊恼与好奇交织。
Pathogens. 2025 Jun 13;14(6):586. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060586.
2
A One Health Message about Bats Increases Intentions to Follow Public Health Guidance on Bat Rabies.一条关于蝙蝠的“同一健康”信息增强了遵循蝙蝠狂犬病公共卫生指南的意愿。
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0156205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156205. eCollection 2016.