Suppr超能文献

轻度勃起功能障碍的男性可从西地那非治疗中获益。

Men with mild erectile dysfunction benefit from sildenafil treatment.

机构信息

CHUM-St-Luc Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2010 Nov;7(11):3725-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02015.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sildenafil treatment has not been evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) trial specific to men with mild erectile dysfunction (ED), defined by a 22-25 score on the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF).

AIM

To assess sildenafil efficacy in sexually dissatisfied men with mild ED.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), IIEF, Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), Erection Hardness Score (EHS 4=completely hard/fully rigid), general efficacy questions (GEQs), event log questions (hardness sufficient for penetration, duration sufficient for successful intercourse, ejaculation/orgasm, and second erection within 24 hours), and analog scales (erection firmness, reliability, and maintenance, and general sexual performance).

METHODS

Eight-week DBPC flexible-dose (25, 50, or 100 mg) trial with 6-week, open-label (OL) extension.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-six men were randomized (mean±standard deviation: age, 50±12 year; ED duration, 3.5±3.2 year). Most had organic or mixed ED. For sildenafil vs. placebo, 66% vs. 89% titrated to 100 mg and efficacy at DBPC end was better, including the EDITS Index score (least squares mean [standard error], 80.3 [2.3] vs. 62.1 [2.5]; P<0.0001); treatment satisfaction (EDITS Index score >50 in 89% vs. 63%; P=0.0001); no ED (IIEF-EF ≥26 in 58% vs. 39%; P<0.05); GEQs (≥4.9-fold greater odds of improved erections and ability to have sexual intercourse); and EHS 4 (47.2% vs. 25.2% of occasions; P<0.0001). At OL end, 93% of men were satisfied (EDITS Index score>50), 77% had no ED, and ≥89% were GEQ responders; mean scores on IIEF domains, the QEQ, and analog scales were >80% of the maximum; 60% of occasions had EHS 4; and event log responses were positive on >80% of occasions, except for second erections (41.9%). Headache, nasal congestion, and flushing, mostly mild to moderate, were the most common adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Men with mild ED derive substantial benefit from sildenafil treatment.

摘要

简介

西地那非治疗在一项针对轻度勃起功能障碍(ED)患者的双盲、安慰剂对照(DBPC)试验中尚未得到评估,这些患者的国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(IIEF-EF)评分为 22-25 分。

目的

评估西地那非治疗轻度 ED 伴性不满意男性的疗效。

主要观察指标

勃起功能障碍治疗满意度问卷(EDITS)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)、勃起质量问卷(QEQ)、勃起硬度评分(EHS4=完全坚硬/完全坚硬)、一般疗效问题(GEQ)、事件日志问题(硬度足以穿透、持续时间足以成功性交、射精/高潮、24 小时内第二次勃起)和模拟量表(勃起硬度、可靠性和维持、一般性功能)。

方法

为期 8 周的 DBPC 剂量灵活(25、50 或 100mg)试验,6 周开放标签(OL)扩展。

结果

176 名男性被随机分配(平均±标准差:年龄 50±12 岁;ED 持续时间 3.5±3.2 年)。大多数患者有器质性或混合性 ED。与安慰剂相比,西地那非组有 66%和 89%的患者滴定至 100mg,并且在 DBPC 末的疗效更好,包括 EDITS 指数评分(最小二乘均值[标准误差],80.3[2.3]比 62.1[2.5];P<0.0001);治疗满意度(EDITS 指数评分>50 的患者占 89%比 63%;P=0.0001);无 ED(IIEF-EF≥26 的患者占 58%比 39%;P<0.05);GEQ(勃起改善和性交能力的可能性增加 4.9 倍);EHS4(47.2%比 25.2%;P<0.0001)。OL 末,93%的男性对治疗满意(EDITS 指数评分>50),77%的男性没有 ED,≥89%的男性对 GEQ 有反应;IIEF 各领域、QEQ 和模拟量表的平均评分均>80%的最大值;EHS4 的发生率为 60%;事件日志的反应在>80%的情况下是积极的,除了第二次勃起(41.9%)。头痛、鼻塞和潮红是最常见的不良反应,大多为轻度至中度。

结论

轻度 ED 患者从西地那非治疗中获得了显著的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验