CHUM-St-Luc Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Sex Med. 2010 Nov;7(11):3725-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02015.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
Sildenafil treatment has not been evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) trial specific to men with mild erectile dysfunction (ED), defined by a 22-25 score on the International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF).
To assess sildenafil efficacy in sexually dissatisfied men with mild ED.
Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), IIEF, Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), Erection Hardness Score (EHS 4=completely hard/fully rigid), general efficacy questions (GEQs), event log questions (hardness sufficient for penetration, duration sufficient for successful intercourse, ejaculation/orgasm, and second erection within 24 hours), and analog scales (erection firmness, reliability, and maintenance, and general sexual performance).
Eight-week DBPC flexible-dose (25, 50, or 100 mg) trial with 6-week, open-label (OL) extension.
One hundred and seventy-six men were randomized (mean±standard deviation: age, 50±12 year; ED duration, 3.5±3.2 year). Most had organic or mixed ED. For sildenafil vs. placebo, 66% vs. 89% titrated to 100 mg and efficacy at DBPC end was better, including the EDITS Index score (least squares mean [standard error], 80.3 [2.3] vs. 62.1 [2.5]; P<0.0001); treatment satisfaction (EDITS Index score >50 in 89% vs. 63%; P=0.0001); no ED (IIEF-EF ≥26 in 58% vs. 39%; P<0.05); GEQs (≥4.9-fold greater odds of improved erections and ability to have sexual intercourse); and EHS 4 (47.2% vs. 25.2% of occasions; P<0.0001). At OL end, 93% of men were satisfied (EDITS Index score>50), 77% had no ED, and ≥89% were GEQ responders; mean scores on IIEF domains, the QEQ, and analog scales were >80% of the maximum; 60% of occasions had EHS 4; and event log responses were positive on >80% of occasions, except for second erections (41.9%). Headache, nasal congestion, and flushing, mostly mild to moderate, were the most common adverse events.
Men with mild ED derive substantial benefit from sildenafil treatment.
西地那非治疗在一项针对轻度勃起功能障碍(ED)患者的双盲、安慰剂对照(DBPC)试验中尚未得到评估,这些患者的国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(IIEF-EF)评分为 22-25 分。
评估西地那非治疗轻度 ED 伴性不满意男性的疗效。
勃起功能障碍治疗满意度问卷(EDITS)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)、勃起质量问卷(QEQ)、勃起硬度评分(EHS4=完全坚硬/完全坚硬)、一般疗效问题(GEQ)、事件日志问题(硬度足以穿透、持续时间足以成功性交、射精/高潮、24 小时内第二次勃起)和模拟量表(勃起硬度、可靠性和维持、一般性功能)。
为期 8 周的 DBPC 剂量灵活(25、50 或 100mg)试验,6 周开放标签(OL)扩展。
176 名男性被随机分配(平均±标准差:年龄 50±12 岁;ED 持续时间 3.5±3.2 年)。大多数患者有器质性或混合性 ED。与安慰剂相比,西地那非组有 66%和 89%的患者滴定至 100mg,并且在 DBPC 末的疗效更好,包括 EDITS 指数评分(最小二乘均值[标准误差],80.3[2.3]比 62.1[2.5];P<0.0001);治疗满意度(EDITS 指数评分>50 的患者占 89%比 63%;P=0.0001);无 ED(IIEF-EF≥26 的患者占 58%比 39%;P<0.05);GEQ(勃起改善和性交能力的可能性增加 4.9 倍);EHS4(47.2%比 25.2%;P<0.0001)。OL 末,93%的男性对治疗满意(EDITS 指数评分>50),77%的男性没有 ED,≥89%的男性对 GEQ 有反应;IIEF 各领域、QEQ 和模拟量表的平均评分均>80%的最大值;EHS4 的发生率为 60%;事件日志的反应在>80%的情况下是积极的,除了第二次勃起(41.9%)。头痛、鼻塞和潮红是最常见的不良反应,大多为轻度至中度。
轻度 ED 患者从西地那非治疗中获得了显著的益处。