• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is "hyper response" to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy a recovery, a remission, or a control?非缺血性心肌病患者对心脏再同步治疗的“高反应”是恢复、缓解还是控制?
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Oct;15(4):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00387.x.
2
Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Nonrandomized On-Treatment Comparison With His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing.用于心脏再同步治疗的左束支起搏:与希氏束起搏和双心室起搏的非随机治疗中比较
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;37(2):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB.非缺血性心肌病和左束支传导阻滞患者中,根据QRS时限和性别对心脏再同步治疗的反应概率及程度
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jul;11(7):1139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
4
Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.真性左束支传导阻滞患者经左束支区域起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的显著疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1002/clc.23462. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Discontinuation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy in a 61-Year-Old Female "-Super-Responder" with Return of a Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to Normal.一位 61 岁女性因扩张型心肌病致心力衰竭的“超级应答者”,其左心室射血分数恢复正常后停止心脏再同步治疗。
Am J Case Rep. 2020 Sep 28;21:e926704. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.926704.
6
Patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and hyper-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characteristics and long-term evolution.非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者及心脏再同步治疗高反应者:特征与长期演变
Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup035.
7
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing.左束支区域起搏治疗非缺血性心肌病患者的心脏再同步治疗。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;6(7):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.011.
8
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: "nonresponders" and "hyperresponders".心脏再同步治疗:“无反应者”与“高反应者”
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Feb;5(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
9
Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支区域起搏用于心脏再同步治疗适应证患者的可行性和疗效。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii54-ii60. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa271.
10
Size Matters: Normalization of QRS Duration to Left Ventricular Dimension Improves Prediction of Long-Term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome.大小很重要:将 QRS 持续时间标准化为左心室维度可改善长期心脏再同步治疗结果的预测。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;11(12):e006767. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006767.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasticity of left ventricular function with cardiac resynchronization therapy.左心室功能的可塑性与心脏再同步治疗。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;57(2):289-294. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00562-7. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
Does 'super-responder' patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy still have indications for neuro-hormonal antagonists? Evidence from long-term follow-up in a single center.心脏再同步治疗的“超级反应者”患者是否仍有使用神经激素拮抗剂的指征?来自单中心长期随访的证据。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):251-258. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.03.015.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and hyper-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characteristics and long-term evolution.非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者及心脏再同步治疗高反应者:特征与长期演变
Europace. 2009 Mar;11(3):350-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup035.
2
Primary failure of cardiac resynchronization therapy: what are the causes and is it worth considering a second attempt? A single-centre experience.
Europace. 2008 Nov;10(11):1308-12. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun245. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
3
Very long term follow-up of cardiac resynchronization therapy: clinical outcome and predictors of mortality.心脏再同步治疗的长期随访:临床结局及死亡预测因素
Eur J Heart Fail. 2008 Aug;10(8):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
4
Normalization of ejection fraction and resolution of symptoms in chronic severe heart failure is possible with modern medical therapy: clinical observations in 11 patients.采用现代医学疗法可使慢性重度心力衰竭患者的射血分数恢复正常并缓解症状:11例临床观察
Am J Ther. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):206-13. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181728a1d.
5
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.《美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心律学会2008年心脏节律异常器械治疗指南》:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002年心脏起搏器和抗心律失常器械植入指南更新的写作委员会)报告:与美国胸外科协会和胸外科医师学会合作制定。
Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(21):e350-408. doi: 10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742. Epub 2008 May 15.
6
Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial.心脏再同步化治疗反应预测因子(PROSPECT)试验的结果。
Circulation. 2008 May 20;117(20):2608-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120. Epub 2008 May 5.
7
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: "nonresponders" and "hyperresponders".心脏再同步治疗:“无反应者”与“高反应者”
Heart Rhythm. 2008 Feb;5(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
8
Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗工作组。与欧洲心律协会合作制定。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(18):2256-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm305. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
9
Influence of left bundle branch block on long-term mortality in a population with heart failure.左束支传导阻滞对心力衰竭人群长期死亡率的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2449-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm262. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
10
Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems in the CARE-HF trial: procedural success rate and safety.心脏再同步治疗系统在CARE-HF试验中的植入:手术成功率与安全性
Europace. 2007 Jul;9(7):516-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum080. Epub 2007 May 31.

非缺血性心肌病患者对心脏再同步治疗的“高反应”是恢复、缓解还是控制?

Is "hyper response" to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy a recovery, a remission, or a control?

作者信息

Castellant Philippe, Orhan Erwann, Bertault-Valls Valerie, Fatemi Marjaneh, Etienne Yves, Blanc Jean-Jacques

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest University Hospital, Boulevard Tanguy Prigent, Brest Cedex, France.

出版信息

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Oct;15(4):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00387.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00387.x
PMID:20946554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6932168/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Some patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recover "normal" left ventricular (LV) function and functional status. However, whether this "normalization" persists or reverts over time remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LV function in patients hyper responder to CRT.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, sinus rhythm, left bundle branch block (LBBB), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, and optimal pharmacological treatment were hyper responder as they fulfilled concurrently the two following criteria: functional recovery (NYHA class I or II) and normalization of LV ejection fraction (LVEF).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 65 ± 30 months between CRT implantation and last evaluation LVEF improved from 26 ± 9 to 59 ± 6% (P < 0.0001). One patient died from pulmonary embolism 31 months after implantation. Three patients exhibited LVEF ≤ 50% at their last follow-up visit (two at 40% and one at 45%). In eight patients, brief cessation of pacing was feasible (three were pacemaker-dependent). Mean QRS duration decreased from 181 ± 23 ms to 143 ± 22 ms (P = 0.006). In one patient, pacing was interrupted for 2 years and LVEF decreased markedly (from 65% to 31%) but returned to normal after a few months when pacing was resumed.

CONCLUSION

In hyper responder patients, "normalization" of LV function after CRT persists as long as pacing is maintained with an excellent survival.

摘要

背景与目的

一些接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的患者恢复了“正常”的左心室(LV)功能和功能状态。然而,这种“正常化”是否会随着时间持续存在或逆转仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估CRT超反应者左心室功能的长期预后。

方法

连续入选11例非缺血性扩张型心肌病、窦性心律、左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能III或IV级且接受最佳药物治疗的患者,这些患者同时满足以下两个标准,即为超反应者:功能恢复(NYHA心功能I或II级)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)正常化。

结果

在CRT植入至最后一次评估期间,平均随访65±30个月,LVEF从26±9%提高到59±6%(P<0.0001)。1例患者在植入后31个月死于肺栓塞。3例患者在最后一次随访时LVEF≤50%(2例为40%,1例为45%)。8例患者可行短暂起搏停止(3例依赖起搏器)。平均QRS时限从181±23ms降至143±22ms(P=0.006)。1例患者起搏中断2年,LVEF显著下降(从65%降至31%),但在恢复起搏几个月后恢复正常。

结论

在CRT超反应者中,只要维持起搏且生存率良好,CRT后左心室功能的“正常化”就会持续存在。