INRIA Research Team MERE, UMR MISTEA, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France.
J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
The debate between niche-based and neutral community theories centers around the question of which forces shape predominantly ecological communities. Niche theory attributes a central role to niche differences between species, which generate a difference between the strength of intra- and interspecific interactions. Neutral theory attributes a central role to migration processes and demographic stochasticity. One possibility to bridge these two theories is to combine them in a common mathematical framework. Here we propose a mathematical model that integrates the two perspectives. From a niche-based perspective, our model can be interpreted as a Lotka-Volterra model with symmetric interactions in which we introduce immigration and demographic stochasticity. From a neutral perspective, it can be interpreted as Hubbell's local community model in which we introduce a difference between intra- and interspecific interactions. We investigate the stationary species abundance distribution and other community properties as functions of the interaction coefficient, the immigration rate and the strength of demographic stochasticity.
基于生态位和中性群落理论的争论集中在哪些力量塑造了主要的生态群落这一问题上。生态位理论认为,物种之间的生态位差异在很大程度上决定了种内和种间相互作用的强度。中性理论则认为,迁移过程和种群动态随机性起着核心作用。将这两种理论结合在一个共同的数学框架中是弥合这两种理论分歧的一种可能性。在这里,我们提出了一个整合这两种观点的数学模型。从基于生态位的角度来看,我们的模型可以被解释为一个具有对称相互作用的Lotka-Volterra 模型,其中我们引入了移民和种群动态随机性。从中性的角度来看,它可以被解释为 Hubbell 的局域群落模型,其中我们引入了种内和种间相互作用的差异。我们研究了作为相互作用系数、移民率和种群动态随机性强度的函数的稳定物种丰度分布和其他群落特性。