• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NCCN 肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略白皮书:利益相关者的建议。

NCCN Oncology Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies White Paper: Recommendations for Stakeholders.

机构信息

PharmD, BCOP, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 275 Commerce Drive, Suite 300, Fort Washington, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Sep;8 Suppl 7:S7-S27. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0135.

DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2010.0135
PMID:20947724
Abstract

REMS are a particularly important issue for oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). A disproportionate number of drugs with complex REMS are used in patients with cancer or hematologic disorders. REMS policies and processes within oncology may act as a model for other clinical areas. A breadth of experience and access to a wide knowledge base exists within oncology that will ensure appropriate development and consideration of the practical implications of REMS. NCCN is uniquely positioned to assume a leadership role in this process given its status as the arbiter of high-quality cancer care based on its world-leading institutions and clinicians. Notwithstanding the potential benefits, the successful design, implementation, and analysis of the FDA's recent requirement for REMS for some high-risk drugs and biologics will present significant challenges for stakeholders, including patients, providers, cancer centers, manufacturers, payors, health information technology vendors, and regulatory agencies. To provide guidance to these stakeholders regarding REMS challenges, the NCCN assembled a work group comprised of thought leaders from NCCN Member Institutions and other outside experts. The Work Group identified challenges across the REMS spectrum, including the areas of standardization, development and assessment of REMS programs, medication guides, provider knowledge and impact on prescribing, provider burden and compensation, and incorporation of REMS into clinical practice.

摘要

风险评估和缓解策略 (REMS) 是肿瘤学和国家综合癌症网络 (NCCN) 特别关注的问题。在癌症或血液疾病患者中使用的具有复杂 REMS 的药物数量不成比例。肿瘤学中的 REMS 政策和流程可能成为其他临床领域的典范。肿瘤学领域拥有广泛的经验和广泛的知识库,这将确保 REMS 的实际影响得到适当的开发和考虑。鉴于其基于世界领先机构和临床医生的高质量癌症护理裁决者地位,NCCN 处于在这一过程中发挥领导作用的独特地位。尽管存在潜在的好处,但成功设计、实施和分析 FDA 最近对一些高风险药物和生物制剂的 REMS 要求将为利益相关者(包括患者、提供者、癌症中心、制造商、支付者、医疗信息技术供应商和监管机构)带来重大挑战。为了向这些利益相关者提供有关 REMS 挑战的指导,NCCN 成立了一个工作组,由 NCCN 成员机构的思想领袖和其他外部专家组成。工作组确定了 REMS 各个方面的挑战,包括标准化、REMS 计划的开发和评估、用药指南、提供者知识及其对处方的影响、提供者负担和补偿,以及将 REMS 纳入临床实践。

相似文献

1
NCCN Oncology Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies White Paper: Recommendations for Stakeholders.NCCN 肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略白皮书:利益相关者的建议。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Sep;8 Suppl 7:S7-S27. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0135.
2
APhA 2011 REMS white paper: Summary of the REMS stakeholder meeting on improving program design and implementation.APhA 2011 REMS 白皮书:改善项目设计和实施的 REMS 利益相关者会议总结。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011 May-Jun;51(3):340-58. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.11519.
3
Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies: impact on patients, health care providers, and health systems.风险评估和缓解策略:对患者、医疗保健提供者和卫生系统的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Dec 15;66(24 Suppl 7):S6-S12. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090461.
4
The US Food and Drug Administration's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program - Current Status and Future Direction.美国食品药品监督管理局的风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)计划——现状与未来方向
Clin Ther. 2016 Dec;38(12):2526-2532. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
5
Comparisons of Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency risk management implementation for recent pharmaceutical approvals: report of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research risk benefit management working group.近期药物批准的美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局风险管理实施比较:国际药物经济学和结果研究学会风险获益管理工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
6
What is the quality of drug safety information for patients: An analysis of REMS educational materials.患者用药安全信息的质量如何:风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)教育材料分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):969-978. doi: 10.1002/pds.4614. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
7
Adaptation for Regulatory Application: A Content Analysis of FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Assessment Plans (2014-2018) Using RE-AIM.监管应用的适应性:使用RE-AIM对美国食品药品监督管理局风险评估和缓解策略评估计划(2014 - 2018年)进行的内容分析
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 25;8:43. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00043. eCollection 2020.
8
White paper on designing a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) system to optimize the balance of patient access, medication safety, and impact on the health care system.设计风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)系统以优化患者获得药物的平衡、药物安全性和对医疗保健系统影响的白皮书。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Nov-Dec;49(6):729-43. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.09541.
9
FDA's risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS): effective and efficient safety tools or process poltergeist?美国食品药品监督管理局的风险评估与缓解策略(REMS):是有效且高效的安全工具还是流程作祟?
Food Drug Law J. 2011;66(4):569-85, ii.
10
Assessment of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies in oncology: summary of the oncology risk evaluation and mitigation strategies workshop.肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略评估:肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略研讨会总结。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Mar;9(2):e24-39. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000620.

引用本文的文献

1
Computer programs used in the field of hospital pharmacy for the management of dangerous drugs: systematic review of literature.医院药学领域用于管理危险药物的计算机程序:文献系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;11:1233264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1233264. eCollection 2023.
2
Consensus-Based Guidance on Opioid Management in Individuals With Advanced Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid Misuse or Use Disorder.基于共识的阿片类药物管理指南:晚期癌症相关疼痛且存在阿片类药物滥用或使用障碍者。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1107-1114. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2191.
3
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures for Voriconazole in the EU: Findings and Lessons Learned from a Healthcare Professional Survey.
欧盟伏立康唑额外风险最小化措施的有效性评估:来自医疗保健专业人员调查的结果与经验教训
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Apr;33(2):121-133. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00273-4.
4
Guidelines for safe handling of hazardous drugs: A systematic review.危险药物安全处理指南:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 May 11;13(5):e0197172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197172. eCollection 2018.
5
Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Practice Patterns in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia (CIA) Treated at Hospital Oncology Clinics.医院肿瘤诊所治疗的化疗所致贫血(CIA)患者促红细胞生成素(ESA)的应用模式
Hosp Pharm. 2013 Feb;48(2):120-6. doi: 10.1310/hpj4802-120.
6
Assessment of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies in oncology: summary of the oncology risk evaluation and mitigation strategies workshop.肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略评估:肿瘤学风险评估和缓解策略研讨会总结。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Mar;9(2):e24-39. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000620.