2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School of Athens University, Athens, Greece.
Retina. 2011 Mar;31(3):464-74. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181f274ec.
The purpose of this study was to compare photodynamic therapy (PDT), ranibizumab, and ranibizumab with PDT in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
In this retrospective comparative study, 30 eyes of 30 patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy were assigned to 1 of the 3 groups. The patients in Group 1 (n = 11) received 1 session of PDT. The patients in Group 2 (n = 10) received 3 monthly intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab, and the patients in Group 3 (n = 9) received 1 session of PDT and 3 injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab. Retreatment, with the same therapeutic scheme in each group, was considered in case of leaking polyps on the indocyanine green angiography in Groups 1 and 3 and persistence or recurrence of subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, and/or hemorrhages in Group 2.
All the patients completed 12 months of follow-up. The visual acuity in the patients of Group 1 improved by 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (P < 0.001), whereas the differences in the visual acuity in the other 2 groups were not statistically significant (0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.8118 in Group 2 and 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P > 0.05 in Group 3). Of the patients in Group 1, 45.45% gained more than 3 lines (P = 0.0056), whereas no patient in Groups 2 and 3 experienced such a difference. No patient in Group 1 and 11.1% (n = 1) in Group 3 had angiographically evident polyps at 12 months, whereas 90% (n = 9) of the patients in Group 2 had persistent leakage. No extensive submacular hemorrhage or other complications were noted during the follow-up period.
Photodynamic therapy resulted in a significantly better outcome at the end of the follow-up, whereas the patients who received ranibizumab or PDT and ranibizumab experienced a stabilization of the disease.
本研究旨在比较光动力疗法(PDT)、雷珠单抗以及 PDT 联合雷珠单抗治疗息肉状脉络膜血管病变(PCV)的疗效。
这是一项回顾性对比研究,纳入 30 例(30 只眼)PCV 患者,将其分为 3 组。第 1 组(n=11)患者接受 1 次 PDT 治疗,第 2 组(n=10)患者每月接受玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg,共 3 次,第 3 组(n=9)患者接受 1 次 PDT 联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg,共 3 次。如果第 1 组和第 3 组吲哚青绿血管造影发现渗漏息肉,或第 2 组出现视网膜下积液、视网膜内积液和/或出血持续或复发,各组患者均行相同的治疗方案进行补救性治疗。
所有患者均完成 12 个月的随访。第 1 组患者视力提高 0.25 个最小分辨角对数(logMAR)单位(P<0.001),而第 2 组和第 3 组患者视力差异无统计学意义(logMAR 分别提高 0.04 和 0.18,P=0.8118 和 P>0.05)。第 1 组患者中有 45.45%(5 例)视力提高超过 3 行(P=0.0056),而第 2 组和第 3 组均无患者视力提高超过 3 行。第 1 组在治疗 12 个月时,仅有 45.45%(5 例)患者有影像学可见息肉,而第 3 组有 11.1%(1 例)患者有影像学可见息肉;第 2 组有 90%(9 例)患者仍存在渗漏。在随访期间,所有患者均未发生广泛的黄斑下出血或其他并发症。
在随访结束时,PDT 治疗的疗效显著更好,而接受雷珠单抗或 PDT 联合雷珠单抗治疗的患者病情稳定。