Powell D A, Buchanan S L, Gibbs C M
Neuroscience Laboratory, Wm. Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC 29201.
Prog Brain Res. 1990;85:433-65; discussion 465-6. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62694-1.
The major conclusion to be drawn from the above-described research on the role of the PFCag in classical conditioning is obviously that it plays a primary and perhaps necessary role in the establishment of visceral cues associated with exposure to classical conditioning contingencies. Specifically, these visceral changes appear to be of an inhibitory character. This is significant, since we have postulated that inhibitory cardiac changes invariably accompany initial processing of sensory stimuli for informational value. Such visceral changes are thus not epiphenomena associated with other simultaneously occurring physiological events. A variety of lesion experiments implicate the PFCm as a central structure in this process, since damage to this area greatly attenuates, and in the case of hypothalamic knife cuts, completely eliminates learned bradycardia. Neuroanatomical tract-tracing experiments revealed that the PFCm and lag have direct projections to the NTS and DVM in the dorsomedial medulla and the nucleus ambiguous in the ventral medulla, all of which provide medullary output control of visceral activities. The nucleus ambiguous and DVM have been specifically implicated in vagal control in the rabbit (Ellenberger et al., 1983). Electrical stimulation of the PFCm provides additional evidence that this area of the brain participates in parasympathetic activities, including cardiac inhibition, since stimulation of the entire MD projection cortex, including the PFCm, produces HR decelerations accompanied by depressor responses. However, since lesions of the Iag produced relatively little effect on conditioned bradycardia, this part of the PFCag does not appear to play a major role in the development of conditioned bradycardia. Electrophysiological recording studies, including both multiple unit as well as extracellular single unit studies reinforce these conclusions. A short latency (40-180 msec) CS-evoked increase in MUA was recorded from cells in both the dorsomedial as well as central PFCm. The magnitude of these CS-evoked neuronal changes (a) was correlated with the magnitude of concomitantly occurring conditioned bradycardia; (b) was trial-related; (c) was not obtained in a similar pseudoconditioning group; and (d) declined to pretraining levels during subsequent experimental extinction. Similar, but not identical, CS-evoked changes in neuronal activity were recorded from MD. Although tone-evoked increases in MUA were also obtained from the Iag, this activity did not show the characteristics of associative learning. Single unit analysis also suggests the importance of the PFCm in elicitation of conditioned bradycardia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
从上述关于前扣带回前部(PFCag)在经典条件反射中作用的研究得出的主要结论显然是,它在与经典条件反射偶联暴露相关的内脏线索建立中起主要且可能是必要的作用。具体而言,这些内脏变化似乎具有抑制性特征。这很重要,因为我们假设抑制性心脏变化总是伴随着对感觉刺激信息价值的初始处理。因此,这种内脏变化不是与其他同时发生的生理事件相关的附带现象。各种损伤实验表明前扣带回中部(PFCm)是这一过程的核心结构,因为该区域受损会大大减弱,而下丘脑切断的情况下则会完全消除习得性心动过缓。神经解剖学追踪实验表明,PFCm和外侧前扣带回(lag)直接投射到延髓背内侧的孤束核(NTS)和背内侧核(DVM)以及延髓腹侧的疑核,所有这些都提供内脏活动的延髓输出控制。疑核和DVM已被明确认为与兔子的迷走神经控制有关(Ellenberger等人,1983年)。对PFCm的电刺激提供了额外证据,表明大脑的这一区域参与副交感神经活动,包括心脏抑制,因为刺激整个内侧背核(MD)投射皮层,包括PFCm,会导致心率减慢并伴有降压反应。然而,由于外侧前扣带回(lag)损伤对条件性心动过缓的影响相对较小,PFCag的这一部分似乎在条件性心动过缓的发展中不起主要作用。电生理记录研究,包括多单位以及细胞外单单位研究,强化了这些结论。在背内侧以及中央PFCm的细胞中记录到了短潜伏期(40 - 180毫秒)的条件刺激(CS)诱发的多单位活动(MUA)增加。这些CS诱发的神经元变化的幅度(a)与同时发生的条件性心动过缓的幅度相关;(b)与试验相关;(c)在类似的假条件反射组中未观察到;并且(d)在随后的实验消退过程中降至训练前水平。从MD记录到了类似但不完全相同的CS诱发的神经元活动变化。虽然也从外侧前扣带回(lag)获得了音调诱发的MUA增加,但这种活动不具有联想学习的特征。单单位分析也表明PFCm在诱发条件性心动过缓中的重要性。(摘要截断于400字)