Pukkala Eero
Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;675:61-112. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_3.
The Nordic countries have a long tradition of large-scale biobanking and comprehensive, population-based health data registries linkable on unique personal identifiers, enabling follow-up studies spanning many decades. Joint Nordic biobank-based studies provide unique opportunities for longitudinal molecular epidemiological research. The Nordic Biological Specimen Banks working group on Cancer Causes and Control (NBSBCCC) has worked out very precise quality assurance principles for handling of the samples, based on the tradition in biobank culture. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how high standards of quality assurance can also be developed for the data related to the subjects and samples in the biobanks. Some of the practices adopted from the strong Nordic cohort study experience evidently improve quality of nested case-control studies nested in biobank cohorts. The data quality requirements for the standardised incidence ratio calculation offer a good way to check and improve accuracy of person identifiers and completeness of follow-up for vital status, which are crucial in case-control studies for picking up right controls for the cases. The nested case-control design applying incidence-density sampling is recommended as an optimal design for most biobank-based studies. It is demonstrated how some types of biobanks have a period immediately after sampling, when the cancer risk is not comparable with the cancer risk in the base population, and how many of the biobanks never represent the normal average population of the region. The estimates on the population-representativeness of the biobanks assist in interpretation of generalisability of results of the studies based on these samples, and the systematic tabulations of numbers of cancer cases will serve in study power estimations. The well over 130,000 prospective cancer cases registered among subjects in the NBSBCCC biobank cohorts have already offered unique possibilities for tens of strong studies, but for rare exposure-outcome combinations predictions on future numbers of cases improve the chance to select the right moment when the study will have accurate statistical power.
北欧国家在大规模生物样本库以及基于人群的、可通过唯一个人标识符进行关联的全面健康数据登记方面有着悠久的传统,这使得长达数十年的随访研究成为可能。基于北欧联合生物样本库的研究为纵向分子流行病学研究提供了独特的机会。北欧癌症病因与控制生物样本库工作组(NBSBCCC)基于生物样本库文化传统,制定了非常精确的样本处理质量保证原则。本文旨在说明如何为生物样本库中与受试者和样本相关的数据制定高标准的质量保证。从北欧强大的队列研究经验中采用的一些做法显然提高了嵌套在生物样本库队列中的巢式病例对照研究的质量。标准化发病率计算的数据质量要求为检查和提高个人标识符的准确性以及生命状态随访的完整性提供了一个好方法,这在病例对照研究中对于为病例挑选合适的对照至关重要。推荐采用发病率密度抽样的巢式病例对照设计作为大多数基于生物样本库研究的最佳设计。文中展示了某些类型的生物样本库在采样后的一段时间内,其癌症风险与基础人群的癌症风险不具有可比性,以及许多生物样本库从未代表该地区的正常平均人群。对生物样本库人群代表性的估计有助于解释基于这些样本的研究结果的可推广性,而癌症病例数的系统列表将用于研究效能估计。NBSBCCC生物样本库队列中的受试者已登记了超过130,000例前瞻性癌症病例,这已经为数十项有力的研究提供了独特的可能性,但对于罕见的暴露 - 结局组合,预测未来病例数可提高选择研究具有准确统计效能的合适时机的机会。