Inadequacy of a polyester (Mersilene) suture for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Through two prospective studies, we evaluated the use of polyester (Mersilene) sutures in penetrating keratoplasty. Study 1 was a randomized comparison of combined running and interrupted Mersilene and nylon sutures (n = 45). Study 2 was a case series of single running Mersilene with postoperative adjustment of suture tension to manage astigmatism (n = 23). Study 1 demonstrated that Mersilene interrupted sutures were 5.5 times more likely to have handling-related complications compared to nylon (P = 0.01); in addition, they were 3 times as likely to have tissue-related complications as nylon interrupted sutures (P = 0.16). Study 2 demonstrated a complication rate of 69% when Mersilene was used as a single adjustable running suture. At 6 months postoperatively, the median refractive astigmatism for the adjustable cases was 3.37 D (mean, 4.03 +/- 2.37 D). Eyes in Study 2 with significant suture-related complications were 2.85 times more likely to have greater than 4 D of refractive astigmatism than were eyes without suture-related complications. We concluded that Mersilene is an undesirable suture for use in penetrating keratoplasty.