Department of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Europace. 2011 Feb;13(2):237-43. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq354. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects of different biventricularly paced heart rates (pHRs) on right ventricular (RV) haemodynamics in heart failure (HF) patients with an implantable haemodynamic monitor (IHM).
At rest, seven pHRs, range 60-120 bpm (steps of 10), were randomly programmed and maintained for 60 s in 10 patients (male, 65±12 years, New York Heart Association II-III). Right ventricular systolic (RVSP) and diastolic pressures, estimated pulmonary artery diastolic (ePAD) pressure, and RV+dP/dt were recorded beat-to-beat using the IHM. Cardiac output (CO) was estimated from the RV pressure waveforms and arterial blood pressure was measured (Portapres®). To compare the haemodynamic effects of increased pHR at rest to that of spontaneous, sinus-driven heart rate (HR) increase, patients also performed a symptom-limited bicycle exercise. At rest, RV+dP/dt increased significantly with elevated pHR (P, main effect, <0.001), whereas filling pressures (ePAD and RVSP) decreased significantly in the range 60-100 bpm (P<0.03 and P<0.003, respectively) but tended to increase or level out at pHRs>00 bpm. At a pHR of 100 bpm, ePAD was 1.4 mmHg lower compared with 60 bpm (P<0.01). Cardiac output increased gradually with elevated pHR at rest (P<0.001). Both total peripheral and estimated pulmonary arterial resistance significantly decreased with increased pHR. During exercise-induced maximum HR increase, RV+dP/dt, ePAD, and CO were all significantly higher compared with the corresponding pHR at rest.
During cardiac resynchronization therapy in HF patients, the force frequency relationship is present in the RV, as increasing the pHR in the range 60-100 bpm results in decreased filling pressures and increased CO.
本研究旨在通过植入式血流动力学监测仪(IHM)探讨不同双心室起搏心率(pHR)对心力衰竭(HF)患者右心室(RV)血流动力学的急性影响。
10 例 HF 患者(男性,65±12 岁,纽约心脏协会 II-III 级)在休息时,分别以 60-120bpm(步长 10)的范围随机编程并维持 60s。使用 IHM 逐搏记录 RV 收缩压(RVSP)和舒张压、估测肺动脉舒张压(ePAD)和 RV+dP/dt。通过 RV 压力波形和动脉血压测量估计心输出量(CO)(Portapres®)。为了比较休息时升高的 pHR 对自主、窦性心动过速(HR)增加的血流动力学影响,患者还进行了症状限制的自行车运动。在休息时,随着 pHR 的升高,RV+dP/dt 显著增加(P,主效应,<0.001),而充盈压(ePAD 和 RVSP)在 60-100bpm 范围内显著降低(P<0.03 和 P<0.003,分别),但在 pHR>00bpm 时趋于增加或持平。在 pHR 为 100bpm 时,ePAD 比 60bpm 低 1.4mmHg(P<0.01)。在休息时,CO 随着 pHR 的升高而逐渐增加(P<0.001)。在休息时,总外周阻力和估测肺动脉阻力均随着 pHR 的升高而显著降低。在运动引起的最大 HR 增加期间,与休息时相应的 pHR 相比,RV+dP/dt、ePAD 和 CO 均显著升高。
在 HF 患者心脏再同步治疗期间,RV 存在力频率关系,因为在 60-100bpm 范围内增加 pHR 会导致充盈压降低和 CO 增加。