Division of Cardiology, S.H. Ho Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Heart. 2012 Jan;98(1):54-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300278. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Atrioventricular (AV) delay in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) recipients are typically optimised at rest. However, there are limited data on the impact of exercise-induced changes in heart rate on the optimal AV delay and left ventricular function.
The authors serially programmed AV delays in 41 CRT patients with intrinsic sinus rhythm at rest and during two stages of supine bicycle exercise with heart rates at 20 bpm (stage I) and 40 bpm (stage II) above baseline. The optimal AV delay during exercise was determined by the iterative method to maximise cardiac output using Doppler echocardiography. Results were compared to physiological change in PR intervals in 56 normal controls during treadmill exercise. The optimal AV delay was progressively shortened (p<0.05) with escalating exercise level (baseline: 123±26 ms vs. stage I: 102±24 ms vs stage II: 70±22 ms, p<0.05). AV delay optimisation led to a significantly higher cardiac output than without optimisation did during stage I (6.2±1.2 l/min vs. 5.2±1.2 l/min, p<0.001) and stage II (6.8±1.6 l/min vs. 5.9±1.3 l/min, p<0.001) exercise. A linear inverse relationship existed between optimal AV delays and heart rates in CRT patients (AV delay=241-1.61×heart rate, R2=0.639, p<0.001) and healthy controls (R2=0.646, p<0.001), but the slope of regression was significantly steeper in CRT patients (p<0.001).
Haemodynamically optimal AV delay shortened progressively with increasing heart rate during exercise, which suggests the need for programming of rate-adaptive AV delay in CRT recipients.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)受者的房室(AV)延迟通常在休息时进行优化。然而,关于运动引起的心率变化对最佳 AV 延迟和左心室功能的影响的数据有限。
作者在 41 例固有窦性节律的 CRT 患者中连续编程 AV 延迟,在静息时和仰卧位踏车运动的两个阶段进行编程,心率比基线高 20 bpm(阶段 I)和 40 bpm(阶段 II)。使用多普勒超声心动图,通过迭代法确定运动时的最佳 AV 延迟,以最大化心输出量。结果与 56 例正常对照者在跑步机运动时 PR 间隔的生理变化进行比较。随着运动水平的逐渐升高(基础水平:123±26 ms vs. 阶段 I:102±24 ms vs. 阶段 II:70±22 ms,p<0.05),最佳 AV 延迟逐渐缩短。与没有优化相比,在阶段 I(6.2±1.2 l/min vs. 5.2±1.2 l/min,p<0.001)和阶段 II(6.8±1.6 l/min vs. 5.9±1.3 l/min,p<0.001)运动时,AV 延迟优化导致心输出量显著增加。CRT 患者和健康对照组之间存在最佳 AV 延迟与心率之间的线性反比关系(AV 延迟=241-1.61×心率,R2=0.639,p<0.001)(R2=0.646,p<0.001),但 CRT 患者的回归斜率明显陡峭(p<0.001)。
运动时最佳 AV 延迟随着心率的增加而逐渐缩短,这表明需要为 CRT 受者编程速率适应性 AV 延迟。