Trueba G A, Bolin C A, Thoen C O
National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Ames, IA 50010.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990 Oct;2(4):323-9. doi: 10.1177/104063879000200413.
Sensitivity and specificity of 4 different antigen preparations from Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo were compared in an enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibodies against serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis in serum. Two antigens prepared using detergents showed serogroup cross-reactivity. A mechanically extracted membrane and a lipopolysaccharide antigen showed a high degree of leptospiral serogroup specificity. The lipopolysaccharide antigen was the most suitable antigen for detection of anti-hardjo antibodies. Enzyme immunoassay was more sensitive than the microscopic agglutination test for detecting antibodies in serum from experimentally and naturally infected cattle. It was not possible to differentiate vaccinated from infected animals or to detect a secondary immune response in vaccinated animals that were subsequently infected.
在一项酶免疫测定中,比较了问号钩端螺旋体血清型哈德乔的4种不同抗原制剂用于检测血清中抗哈德乔型博维哈德乔血清型抗体的敏感性和特异性。两种使用去污剂制备的抗原显示出血清群交叉反应性。一种机械提取的膜抗原和一种脂多糖抗原显示出高度的钩端螺旋体血清群特异性。脂多糖抗原是检测抗哈德乔抗体最合适的抗原。在检测实验感染和自然感染牛血清中的抗体时,酶免疫测定比显微镜凝集试验更敏感。无法区分接种疫苗的动物和感染动物,也无法检测随后感染的接种疫苗动物的二次免疫反应。