Suppr超能文献

振动引起的不适中平动和转动的相对贡献。

Relative contribution of translational and rotational vibration to discomfort.

机构信息

Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2010;48(5):519-29. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-19.

Abstract

Understanding how vibration affects discomfort is an important factor for improving work and travelling experience. Methods of evaluating health effects from whole-body vibration are closely linked to those for evaluating discomfort in ISO 2631-1. The standard includes a method to evaluate discomfort using twelve axes of vibration with a similar approach to that for evaluating health effects; thus using all twelve axes gives a possibility to evaluate both health and discomfort. The full 12-axis method has not been widely used in practice or validated in a multi-axis environment. The standard guidance is not explicit, thus different interpretations are possible especially when determining the method of comparing or combining vibration in different axes. Furthermore there are not enough studies conducted in multi-axis environments to suggest the optimal combination of axes. In this study ISO 2631-1 method was tested and optimised using a multi-axis test bench at Loughborough University, UK. Subjects were exposed to stimuli which represented vibration characteristics from field measurements. Each stimulus, lasting 15 s, was judged using a continuous judgement, cross-modal matching method. The seat translational and rotational and the backrest translational axes were used in the analyses. There was no vibration at the floor, in order to constrain the number of independent variables. Results showed that correlation for discomfort improved with more complex analysis procedures. However a good correlation was also achieved using just seat translational axes with optimised multiplying factors. The results showed that frequency weightings and r.m.s. averaging improved correlation between vibration and subjective ratings of discomfort. Multiplying factors specified in ISO 2631-1 degraded the correlation between objective and subjective measures of discomfort, therefore an improved set of factors were determined. The new factors showed improvement by placing more emphasis on seat fore-and-aft and lateral axes.

摘要

了解振动如何影响不适感是改善工作和旅行体验的一个重要因素。评估全身振动健康影响的方法与评估 ISO 2631-1 中不适感的方法密切相关。该标准包括一种使用十二个振动轴评估不适感的方法,其方法与评估健康影响的方法相似;因此,使用所有十二个轴可以评估健康和不适感。完整的 12 轴方法在实践中尚未广泛使用,也未在多轴环境中得到验证。标准指南不明确,因此在确定比较或组合不同轴振动的方法时,可能会有不同的解释。此外,在多轴环境中进行的研究还不足以提出最佳的轴组合。在这项研究中,在英国拉夫堡大学的多轴试验台上测试和优化了 ISO 2631-1 方法。受试者接触到了代表现场测量中振动特征的刺激。每个刺激持续 15 秒,使用连续判断、跨模态匹配方法进行判断。在分析中使用了座椅平移和旋转以及靠背平移轴。地板上没有振动,以限制独立变量的数量。结果表明,随着分析程序变得更加复杂,不适感的相关性得到了提高。然而,仅使用座椅平移轴并优化相乘因子也可以获得良好的相关性。结果表明,频率加权和均方根平均值提高了振动与主观不适感评分之间的相关性。ISO 2631-1 中规定的相乘因子降低了振动与主观不适感测量之间的相关性,因此确定了一组改进的因子。新的因子通过更加重视座椅前后和左右轴来提高相关性。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验