Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Breast Disease Unit, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave, Ribeirão Preto, SP 14048-900, Brazil.
Med Oncol. 2011 Dec;28 Suppl 1:S65-9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9711-0. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
Reducing primary tumor volume is the main role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We evaluated the benefit of adding docetaxel to anthracyclin as neoadjuvant therapy. This study is a retrospective cohort analysis comparing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients subjected to docetaxel and epirubicin or 5-fluoruracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide combinations (DE and FEC group, respectively). The mean number of chemotherapy delivered was similar in both groups (P = 0.8). A total of 316 patients were treated (151 in FEC group and 165 in DE group). Primary endpoint was the clinical and pathological response to therapy. Breast conserving surgery rate was compared. In T1/2 staged patients, the complete clinical response rate was 7.5% in FEC group and 32% in DE group (P = 0.002), and the breast conserving surgery rate was 72 and 73% in FEC and DE groups, respectively (P = 0.9). In the subset of patients staged as T3 and T4a-c, objective response was higher in DE group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Breast conserving surgery rate was 38 and 63% in FEC and DE groups, respectively, in T3 staged patients and, 20.5 and 37% in T4a-c staged patients (P = 0.003 and 0.08). Despite the similar number of chemotherapy cycles delivered in both groups, the presence of microscopic axillary lymph node involvement after chemotherapy was less frequent in DE group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DE combination is more effective in terms of clinical and pathological response propitiating higher breast conserving surgery rate than FEC combination in stage II and III breast cancer.
缩小原发性肿瘤体积是乳腺癌新辅助化疗的主要作用。我们评估了在蒽环类药物基础上加用多西紫杉醇作为新辅助治疗的益处。本研究是一项回顾性队列分析,比较了接受多西紫杉醇联合表柔比星或氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和环磷酰胺联合(分别为 DE 和 FEC 组)新辅助化疗的患者的疗效。两组的化疗平均次数相似(P = 0.8)。共治疗了 316 例患者(FEC 组 151 例,DE 组 165 例)。主要终点是治疗的临床和病理反应。比较保乳手术率。在 T1/2 期患者中,FEC 组完全临床缓解率为 7.5%,DE 组为 32%(P = 0.002),FEC 和 DE 组的保乳手术率分别为 72%和 73%(P = 0.9)。在 T3 和 T4a-c 期患者亚组中,DE 组的客观缓解率更高(P < 0.0001 和 P = 0.008)。T3 期患者中,FEC 和 DE 组的保乳手术率分别为 38%和 63%,T4a-c 期患者分别为 20.5%和 37%(P = 0.003 和 0.08)。尽管两组接受的化疗周期数相似,但 DE 组化疗后腋窝淋巴结微转移的发生率较低。DE 联合新辅助化疗在 II 期和 III 期乳腺癌中较 FEC 联合更有效,能提高临床和病理反应,从而提高保乳手术率。