Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Dec;152(12):2105-11. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0826-z. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
Hemifacial spasm is commonly caused by arterial compression of the facial nerve. Although vascular compression usually occurs at the facial nerve exit zone, in some cases, the facial nerve is compressed more distally. We analyzed the clinical outcome of microneurovascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm caused by either distal or proximal compression.
From September 1978 to March 2009, 2,137 patients underwent microneurovascular decompression for hemifacial spasm due to vascular compression of the facial nerve, including 2,022 patients (94.6%) with proximal compression, 101 patients (4.7%) with both proximal and distal (mixed) compression, and 14 patients (0.7%) with only distal compression.
Complete remission of facial spasm occurred in 10 of 14 patients (71.4%) with compression of the cisternal portion, compared with 1,773 of 2,022 patients (87.7%) with proximal compression (P = 0.08) and 87 of 101 patients (86.1%) with mixed compression (P = 0.23). Permanent facial weakness occurred in one patient (7.1%) with compression of the cisternal portion, 18 patients (0.9%) with proximal compression, and one patient (1.0%) with mixed compression. Permanent hearing loss occurred in no patients with compression of the cisternal portion, 29 patients (1.4%) with proximal compression, and three patients (3.0%) with mixed compression.
Outcomes after microneurovascular decompression for hemifacial spasm with compression of the cisternal portion were not statistically different than with proximal compression of the facial nerve. When the clinical diagnosis of hemifacial spasm is confirmed and vascular compression is seen only in the cisternal portion of the facial nerve, microneurovascular decompression for these patients provides outcomes similar to those with proximal compression of the facial nerve.
面肌痉挛通常由面神经的动脉压迫引起。虽然血管压迫通常发生在面神经出口区,但在某些情况下,面神经在更远端受压。我们分析了因面神经远端或近端受压导致面肌痉挛患者微血管减压术的临床效果。
1978 年 9 月至 2009 年 3 月,2137 例因血管压迫面神经导致面肌痉挛的患者接受微血管减压术治疗,其中 2022 例(94.6%)为近端压迫,101 例(4.7%)为远近端(混合)压迫,14 例(0.7%)仅为远端压迫。
14 例(100%)压迫桥小脑角段的患者面神经痉挛完全缓解,与 2022 例(87.7%)近端压迫患者(P=0.08)和 101 例(86.1%)混合压迫患者相比(P=0.23)。1 例(7.1%)压迫桥小脑角段的患者出现永久性面瘫,18 例(0.9%)近端压迫患者和 1 例(1.0%)混合压迫患者出现永久性面瘫。压迫桥小脑角段的患者无永久性听力丧失,29 例(1.4%)近端压迫患者和 3 例(3.0%)混合压迫患者出现永久性听力丧失。
微血管减压术治疗桥小脑角段受压的面肌痉挛的效果与面神经近端受压无统计学差异。当临床诊断为面肌痉挛,且仅见面神经在桥小脑角段受压时,对这些患者进行微血管减压术的效果与面神经近端受压相似。