Son Byung-Chul, Ko Hak-Cheol, Choi Jin-Gyu
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Catholic Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Case Rep Neurol Med. 2019 Jan 1;2019:8526157. doi: 10.1155/2019/8526157. eCollection 2019.
Although primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) is mostly related to a vascular compression of the facial nerve at its root exit zone (REZ), its occurrence in association with distal, cisternal portion has been repeatedly reported during the last two decades. We report two patients with typical HFS caused by distal neurovascular compression, in which the spasm was successfully treated with microvascular decompression (MVD). Vascular compression of distal, cisternal portion of the facial nerve was identified preoperatively in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It was confirmed again with intraoperative findings of compression of cisternal portion of the facial nerve by the meatal loop of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) and absence of any offending vessel in the REZ of the facial nerve. Immediate disappearance of lateral spread response (LSR) after decompression and resolution of spasm after the operation again validated that HFS in the current patients originated from the vascular compression of distal, cisternal portion of the facial nerves. According to our literature review of 64 patients with HFS caused by distal neurovascular compression, distal compression can be classified by pure distal neurovascular compression (31 cases, 48.4%) and double compression (both distal segment and the REZ of the facial nerves, 33 cases [51.6%]) according to the presence or absence of simultaneous offender in the REZ. Eighty-four percent of 64 identified distal offenders were the AICA, especially its meatal and postmeatal segments. Before awareness of distal neurovascular compression causing HFS and sophisticated MRI imaging (before 2000), the rate of reoperation was high (58%). Preoperative MRI and intraoperative monitoring of LSR seems to be an essential element in determination of real offending vessel in MVD caused by distal offender.
虽然原发性面肌痉挛(HFS)大多与面神经在其根部出口区(REZ)受到血管压迫有关,但在过去二十年中,其与面神经远端脑池段受压相关的情况也屡有报道。我们报告了两名由远端神经血管压迫导致典型HFS的患者,他们通过微血管减压术(MVD)成功治愈了痉挛。术前在磁共振成像(MRI)中发现了面神经远端脑池段的血管压迫。术中发现小脑前下动脉(AICA)的内听道袢压迫面神经脑池段,且面神经REZ未发现任何致病血管,再次证实了这一点。减压后外侧扩散反应(LSR)立即消失以及术后痉挛缓解,再次验证了当前患者的HFS源自面神经远端脑池段的血管压迫。根据我们对64例由远端神经血管压迫导致HFS患者的文献综述,根据面神经REZ是否同时存在致病因素,远端压迫可分为单纯远端神经血管压迫(31例,48.4%)和双重压迫(面神经远端段和REZ均受压,33例[51.6%])。在64例已确定的远端致病血管中,84%是AICA,尤其是其内听道段和内听道后段。在认识到远端神经血管压迫可导致HFS以及先进的MRI成像技术出现之前(2000年以前),再次手术率很高(58%)。术前MRI和术中对LSR的监测似乎是确定由远端致病血管导致的MVD中真正致病血管的关键因素。