Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):855-69. doi: 10.1037/a0020961.
The authors investigate whether need for closure affects how people seek order in judging social relations. In Study 1, the authors find that people who have a high need for closure (NFC) were more likely to assume their social contacts were connected to each other (i.e., transitivity) when this was not the case. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors examine another form of order in network relations--racial homophily--and find that high-NFC participants were more inclined to believe that 2 individuals from the same racial category (e.g., African American) were friends than two racially dissimilar individuals. Furthermore, high-NFC individuals were more likely to make errors when judging a racially mixed group of people; specifically, they recalled more racial homophily (racially similar people sitting closer together) than had actually appeared.
作者研究了封闭需求是否会影响人们在判断社会关系时对秩序的寻求。在研究 1 中,作者发现,当社交联系人之间实际上没有联系时,具有较高封闭需求(NFC)的人更有可能假设他们的社交联系人彼此相关(即传递性)。在研究 2 和研究 3 中,作者考察了网络关系中的另一种秩序形式——种族同质性,并发现高 NFC 参与者更倾向于相信来自同一种族类别的两个人(例如,非裔美国人)是朋友,而不是两个种族不同的人。此外,高 NFC 个体在判断种族混合群体时更容易犯错;具体来说,他们回忆起更多的种族同质性(种族相似的人坐得更近),而实际上出现的情况则更少。