Suppr超能文献

喹硫平与安慰剂治疗谵妄的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of quetiapine versus placebo in the treatment of delirium.

机构信息

Department of Liaison Psychiatry, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2010 Nov;69(5):485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a commonly occurring complex neuropsychiatric disorder. Evidence for its treatment based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is poor.

AIMS

To determine the efficacy and acceptability of quetiapine in the treatment of delirium.

METHOD

A double-blind, RCT was conducted. A total of 42 patients were randomized to quetiapine or a placebo group. The primary outcome measure was the Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98. Other scales used were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Global Improvement. In order to account for missing data, a nonlinear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

The quetiapine group improved more rapidly than the placebo group. Specifically, the quetiapine group recovered 82.7% faster (S.E. 37.1%, P=.026) than the placebo group in terms of DRS-R-98 severity score. In terms of the DRS-R-98 noncognitive subscale, the quetiapine group improved 57.7% faster (S.E. 29.2%, P=.048) than the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine has the potential to more quickly reduce the severity of noncognitive aspects of delirium. This study was underpowered for treatment comparisons at specific points in time but nonetheless detected significant differences when analyzing the whole study period. While it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions, further larger studies exploring the use of quetiapine in other delirium populations seem justified. Larger increments in the dose of quetiapine may yield even stronger results.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种常见的复杂神经精神障碍。基于随机对照试验 (RCT) 的治疗证据很差。

目的

确定喹硫平治疗谵妄的疗效和可接受性。

方法

进行了一项双盲、RCT。共有 42 名患者被随机分配到喹硫平或安慰剂组。主要结局测量是修订后的 98 项谵妄评定量表 (DRS-R-98)。其他使用的量表包括简明精神病评定量表、简易精神状态检查和临床总体印象。为了考虑缺失数据,使用非线性混合效应模型来估计两组之间的差异。

结果

喹硫平组的改善速度快于安慰剂组。具体来说,在 DRS-R-98 严重程度评分方面,喹硫平组的恢复速度比安慰剂组快 82.7%(S.E. 37.1%,P=.026)。在 DRS-R-98 非认知子量表方面,喹硫平组的改善速度比安慰剂组快 57.7%(S.E. 29.2%,P=.048)。

结论

喹硫平有可能更快地减轻谵妄非认知方面的严重程度。本研究在特定时间点进行治疗比较时的效力不足,但在分析整个研究期间时仍检测到了显著差异。虽然不可能得出明确的结论,但进一步探索喹硫平在其他谵妄人群中的应用的更大规模研究似乎是合理的。喹硫平剂量的更大增加可能会产生更强的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验