Suppr超能文献

语义性痴呆伴类别特异性:一项对照病例系列研究。

Semantic dementia with category specificity:acomparative case-series study.

机构信息

University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):307-26. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000301.

Abstract

Patients with semantic dementia, the temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia, are relevant to both the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological debates in the category-specific literature. These patients present with a selective and progressive semantic deficit consequent on circumscribed atrophy of the inferolateral polar temporal lobes bilaterally, including the inferotemporal gyrus. In this study, a patient KH with a significant advantage for artefacts over living things was compared to five other semantic dementia patients with commensurate levels of semantic impairment. KH demonstrated a consistent category difference in favour of artefacts across all the expressive and receptive semantic tests. This difference was reliable even when familiarity, frequency, and other potential confounding factors were controlled. While KH demonstrated an association between poor knowledge of sensory attributes and a consistently greater impairment on living things than artefacts, the other patients did not. As observed in a number of previous studies, all five of the patients, contrasted to KH, exhibited an advantage for functional/associative over sensory attributes but without demonstrating the category-specific deficit that the sensory-functional theory (and the locus of their atrophy) might predict. The results of this and other studies are discussed in relation to four accounts of category specificity: the sensory-functional theory, domain-specific knowledge systems, intercorrelated features, and individual differences.

摘要

语义痴呆症患者是额颞叶痴呆症的颞叶变异型,与类别特异性文献中的神经解剖和神经心理学争论都有关。这些患者表现为选择性和进行性语义缺陷,继发于双侧下外侧极颞叶的局灶性萎缩,包括下颞叶回。在这项研究中,与其他 5 名语义痴呆症患者进行比较,患者 KH 对人工制品有显著的优势,而这些患者的语义损伤程度相当。KH 在所有表达性和接受性语义测试中都表现出一致的类别差异,有利于人工制品。即使控制了熟悉度、频率和其他潜在的混杂因素,这种差异也是可靠的。虽然 KH 表现出对感官属性的了解较差与对生物的认知损害比人工制品更严重之间的关联,但其他患者则没有。与 KH 相反,正如许多先前的研究中观察到的那样,所有五名患者都表现出对功能/联想属性的优势,而不是对感官属性的优势,但没有表现出感觉-功能理论(以及他们的萎缩部位)可能预测的类别特异性缺陷。本研究和其他研究的结果将与四种类别特异性解释进行讨论:感觉-功能理论、特定领域的知识系统、相互关联的特征和个体差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验