• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义性痴呆伴类别特异性:一项对照病例系列研究。

Semantic dementia with category specificity:acomparative case-series study.

机构信息

University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):307-26. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000301.

DOI:10.1080/02643290244000301
PMID:20957573
Abstract

Patients with semantic dementia, the temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia, are relevant to both the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological debates in the category-specific literature. These patients present with a selective and progressive semantic deficit consequent on circumscribed atrophy of the inferolateral polar temporal lobes bilaterally, including the inferotemporal gyrus. In this study, a patient KH with a significant advantage for artefacts over living things was compared to five other semantic dementia patients with commensurate levels of semantic impairment. KH demonstrated a consistent category difference in favour of artefacts across all the expressive and receptive semantic tests. This difference was reliable even when familiarity, frequency, and other potential confounding factors were controlled. While KH demonstrated an association between poor knowledge of sensory attributes and a consistently greater impairment on living things than artefacts, the other patients did not. As observed in a number of previous studies, all five of the patients, contrasted to KH, exhibited an advantage for functional/associative over sensory attributes but without demonstrating the category-specific deficit that the sensory-functional theory (and the locus of their atrophy) might predict. The results of this and other studies are discussed in relation to four accounts of category specificity: the sensory-functional theory, domain-specific knowledge systems, intercorrelated features, and individual differences.

摘要

语义痴呆症患者是额颞叶痴呆症的颞叶变异型,与类别特异性文献中的神经解剖和神经心理学争论都有关。这些患者表现为选择性和进行性语义缺陷,继发于双侧下外侧极颞叶的局灶性萎缩,包括下颞叶回。在这项研究中,与其他 5 名语义痴呆症患者进行比较,患者 KH 对人工制品有显著的优势,而这些患者的语义损伤程度相当。KH 在所有表达性和接受性语义测试中都表现出一致的类别差异,有利于人工制品。即使控制了熟悉度、频率和其他潜在的混杂因素,这种差异也是可靠的。虽然 KH 表现出对感官属性的了解较差与对生物的认知损害比人工制品更严重之间的关联,但其他患者则没有。与 KH 相反,正如许多先前的研究中观察到的那样,所有五名患者都表现出对功能/联想属性的优势,而不是对感官属性的优势,但没有表现出感觉-功能理论(以及他们的萎缩部位)可能预测的类别特异性缺陷。本研究和其他研究的结果将与四种类别特异性解释进行讨论:感觉-功能理论、特定领域的知识系统、相互关联的特征和个体差异。

相似文献

1
Semantic dementia with category specificity:acomparative case-series study.语义性痴呆伴类别特异性:一项对照病例系列研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):307-26. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000301.
2
The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.语义距离在生物类别特异性损伤中的作用:来自一例语义性痴呆的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1017-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.006. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
3
[Category-specific deficits in semantic dementia: links between perception and semantic knowledge].[语义性痴呆的类别特异性缺陷:感知与语义知识之间的联系]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2011 Sep;9(3):327-35. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2011.0276.
4
Selective impairment of living things and musical instruments on a verbal 'Semantic Knowledge Questionnaire' in a case of apperceptive visual agnosia.知觉性视觉失认症病例在言语“语义知识问卷”上对生物和乐器的选择性损伤。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Oct;80(1):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
5
Category specificity and feature knowledge:evidence from new sensory-quality categories.类别特异性和特征知识:来自新感觉质量类别的证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):327-53. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000310.
6
Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia.语义性痴呆中对著名面孔和名字的认知。
Brain. 2004 Apr;127(Pt 4):860-72. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh099. Epub 2004 Feb 25.
7
Semantic relevance, domain specificity and the sensory/functional theory of category-specificity.语义相关性、领域特异性与类别特异性的感觉/功能理论
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):966-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.028. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia.一幅画胜过千言万语吗?来自语义性痴呆患者概念定义的证据。
Brain Lang. 1999 Dec;70(3):309-35. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2143.
9
Taking both sides: do unilateral anterior temporal lobe lesions disrupt semantic memory?兼顾正反两方:单侧前颞叶损伤是否会破坏语义记忆?
Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3243-55. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq264. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
10
Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: a critical survey.类别特异性语义障碍的神经解剖学关联:一项批判性综述。
Memory. 1995 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):247-64. doi: 10.1080/09658219508253153.

引用本文的文献

1
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Concrete and Abstract Concepts in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review.原发性进行性失语症和阿尔茨海默病中的具体概念和抽象概念:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2023 May 5;13(5):765. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050765.
3
Temporopolar regions of the human brain.人类大脑的颞极区域。
Brain. 2023 Jan 5;146(1):20-41. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac339.
4
A category-selective semantic memory deficit for animate objects in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.语义变异型原发性进行性失语中对有生命物体的类别选择性语义记忆缺陷。
Brain Commun. 2021 Sep 14;3(4):fcab210. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab210. eCollection 2021.
5
A unified neurocognitive model of semantics language social behaviour and face recognition in semantic dementia.语义性痴呆中语义、语言、社会行为和面孔识别的统一神经认知模型。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 22;11(1):2595. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16089-9.
6
Food knowledge depends upon the integrity of both sensory and functional properties: a VBM, TBSS and DTI tractography study.食物知识依赖于感官和功能特性的完整性:一项基于体素的形态学测量、基于束的形态学测量和弥散张量成像轨迹研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 15;9(1):7439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43919-8.
7
Concrete versus abstract forms of social concept: an fMRI comparison of knowledge about people versus social terms.具体的和抽象的社会概念形式:关于人的知识与社会术语的 fMRI 比较。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0136.
8
What matters in semantic feature processing for persons with stroke-aphasia: Evidence from an auditory concept-feature verification task.中风失语症患者语义特征处理中的关键因素:来自听觉概念特征验证任务的证据。
Aphasiology. 2014;28(7):823-839. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.913769. Epub 2014 May 20.
9
Verbal Description of Concrete Objects: A Method for Assessing Semantic Circumlocution in Persons With Aphasia.具体物体的言语描述:一种评估失语症患者语义迂回的方法。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S828-37. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0154.
10
Beyond the visual word form area: the orthography-semantics interface in spelling and reading.超越视觉词形区:拼写与阅读中的正字法-语义界面
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(5-6):482-510. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.909399. Epub 2014 May 16.