Snowden J S, Thompson J C, Neary D
Cerebral Function Unit, Greater Manchester Neuroscience Centre, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
Brain. 2004 Apr;127(Pt 4):860-72. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh099. Epub 2004 Feb 25.
Semantic dementia is a focal clinical syndrome, resulting from degeneration of the temporal lobes and characterized by progressive loss of conceptual knowledge about the world. Because of the highly circumscribed nature of the disorder it is a natural model for improving understanding of how semantic information is cerebrally represented. There is currently a lack of consensus. One view proposes the existence of modality specific meaning systems, in which visual and verbal information are stored separately. An opposing view assumes that information is represented by a unitary, amodal semantic system. The present study explores these alternatives in an examination of famous face and name knowledge in 15 patients with semantic dementia. The study of face recognition in patients with an established semantic disorder also permits an examination of the relationship between semantic dementia and the focal clinical syndrome of progressive prosopagnosia. The semantic dementia patients were profoundly impaired on both face and name identification and familiarity judgement tasks compared with amnesic patients with Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls. However, whereas the two reference groups performed better for names than faces, the semantic group showed the opposite pattern. This overall profile masked individual differences: semantic dementia patients with predominant left temporal lobe atrophy showed better recognition of names than faces, whereas patients with right temporal predominance showed the reverse pattern. Relative superiority for names or faces was mirrored by corresponding superiority for words or pictures on a standard semantic test. We interpret the findings as inconsistent with a unitary, amodal model of semantic memory. However, the data are not wholly compatible with a strict multiple system account. The data favour a model of semantic memory comprising a single interconnected network, with dedicated brain regions representing modality specific information. The data emphasize the importance of the anterior, inferolateral parts of the left temporal lobe for the representation of names and the corresponding parts of the right temporal lobe for faces. Dissociations between face and name knowledge provide a challenge for existing models of face processing. Moreover, they lead us to argue that the focal syndrome of progressive prosopagnosia is one of the clinical presentations of semantic dementia and not a separate clinical entity.
语义性痴呆是一种局灶性临床综合征,由颞叶变性引起,其特征是对世界的概念性知识逐渐丧失。由于该疾病具有高度局限性,它是增进对语义信息在大脑中如何表征理解的天然模型。目前尚无共识。一种观点认为存在特定模态的意义系统,其中视觉和言语信息分别存储。另一种相反的观点则假定信息由单一的、非模态的语义系统表征。本研究通过对15例语义性痴呆患者的著名面孔和姓名知识进行检测,探讨了这些不同观点。对患有已确诊语义障碍患者的面孔识别研究,也有助于考察语义性痴呆与进行性面孔失认这一局灶性临床综合征之间的关系。与患有阿尔茨海默病的遗忘症患者和健康对照相比,语义性痴呆患者在面孔和姓名识别以及熟悉度判断任务上均有严重受损。然而,虽然两个参照组在姓名识别上比面孔识别表现更好,但语义性痴呆组却呈现相反的模式。这种总体特征掩盖了个体差异:以左侧颞叶萎缩为主的语义性痴呆患者对姓名的识别比对面孔的识别更好,而右侧颞叶为主的患者则呈现相反的模式。在标准语义测试中,姓名或面孔的相对优势与单词或图片的相应优势相对应。我们将这些发现解释为与单一的、非模态的语义记忆模型不一致。然而,数据并不完全符合严格的多系统解释。数据支持一种语义记忆模型,该模型由一个单一的相互连接的网络组成,其中专门的脑区表征特定模态的信息。数据强调了左侧颞叶前下部分对面孔表征的重要性以及右侧颞叶相应部分对面孔表征的重要性。面孔和姓名知识之间的分离对现有的面孔加工模型提出了挑战。此外,它们使我们认为进行性面孔失认的局灶性综合征是语义性痴呆的临床表现之一,而非一个独立的临床实体。