• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狼是否拯救了黄石公园的山杨?行为介导的营养级联的景观水平测试。

Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade.

机构信息

U.S. Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Zoology and Physiology Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA.

出版信息

Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2742-55. doi: 10.1890/09-1949.1.

DOI:10.1890/09-1949.1
PMID:20957967
Abstract

Behaviorally mediated trophic cascades (BMTCs) occur when the fear of predation among herbivores enhances plant productivity. Based primarily on systems involving small-bodied predators, BMTCs have been proposed as both strong and ubiquitous in natural ecosystems. Recently, however, synthetic work has suggested that the existence of BMTCs may be mediated by predator hunting mode, whereby passive (sit-and-wait) predators have much stronger effects than active (coursing) predators. One BMTC that has been proposed for a wide-ranging active predator system involves the reintroduction of wolves (Canis lupus) to Yellowstone National Park, USA, which is thought to be leading to a recovery of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) by causing elk (Cervus elaphus) to avoid foraging in risky areas. Although this BMTC has been generally accepted and highly popularized, it has never been adequately tested. We assessed whether wolves influence aspen by obtaining detailed demographic data on aspen Stands using tree rings and by monitoring browsing levels in experimental elk exclosures arrayed across a gradient of predation risk for three years. Our study demonstrates that the historical failure of aspen to regenerate varied widely among stands (last recruitment year ranged from 1892 to 1956), and our data do not indicate an abrupt cessation of recruitment. This pattern of recruitment failure appears more consistent with a gradual increase in elk numbers rather than a rapid behavioral shift in elk foraging following wolf extirpation. In addition, our estimates of relative survivorship of young browsable aspen indicate that aspen are not currently recovering in Yellowstone, even in the presence of a large wolf population. Finally, in an experimental test of the BMTC hypothesis we found that the impacts of elk browsing on aspen demography are not diminished in sites where elk are at higher risk of predation by wolves. These findings suggest the need to further evaluate how trophic cascades are mediated by predator-prey life history and ecological context.

摘要

当草食动物因捕食者的恐惧而提高植物生产力时,就会发生行为介导的营养级联(BMTC)。基于涉及小体型捕食者的系统,BMTC 被认为在自然生态系统中具有强大而普遍的作用。然而,最近的综合研究表明,BMTC 的存在可能受到捕食者狩猎模式的调节,其中被动(坐等)捕食者的影响比主动(追逐)捕食者大得多。一个被广泛应用于广泛活动的捕食者系统的 BMTC 涉及到将狼(Canis lupus)重新引入美国黄石国家公园,据认为这导致麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)避免在高风险地区觅食,从而使颤杨(Populus tremuloides)得以恢复。尽管这种 BMTC 已被普遍接受并得到高度推广,但它从未得到充分验证。我们通过使用树木年轮获取有关颤杨林分的详细人口统计数据,并通过在三年时间内监测实验性麋鹿围栏内的觅食水平,评估了狼是否通过这种方式影响颤杨。我们的研究表明,历史上颤杨的再生情况在林分之间差异很大(最后一次招募年份范围从 1892 年到 1956 年),而且我们的数据并没有表明招募的突然停止。这种招募失败的模式似乎更符合麋鹿数量的逐渐增加,而不是在狼灭绝后麋鹿觅食行为的迅速转变。此外,我们对可食用年轻颤杨的相对存活率的估计表明,即使在有大量狼群的情况下,黄石公园的颤杨也没有恢复。最后,在对 BMTC 假设的实验测试中,我们发现,在狼对麋鹿捕食风险较高的地方,麋鹿对颤杨种群动态的影响并没有减弱。这些发现表明,需要进一步评估捕食者-猎物的生活史和生态背景如何调节营养级联。

相似文献

1
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade.狼是否拯救了黄石公园的山杨?行为介导的营养级联的景观水平测试。
Ecology. 2010 Sep;91(9):2742-55. doi: 10.1890/09-1949.1.
2
Predation risk, elk, and aspen: tests of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.捕食风险、麋鹿和白杨树:大黄石生态系统中行为介导的营养级联的检验。
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2600-14. doi: 10.1890/11-1990.1.
3
Recovering aspen follow changing elk dynamics in Yellowstone: evidence of a trophic cascade?黄石公园中颤杨的恢复与麋鹿动态变化相关:营养级联效应的证据?
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):252-63. doi: 10.1890/14-0712.1.
4
Willow on Yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade?黄石公园北部地区的柳树:营养级联效应的证据?
Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1563-71. doi: 10.1890/06-1254.1.
5
Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem.放牧生态系统中的猎物风险分配
Ecol Appl. 2006 Feb;16(1):285-98. doi: 10.1890/04-0623.
6
Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone.黄石公园内狼对灰熊的营养级联效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):223-33. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12123. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Wolf presence and increased willow consumption by Yellowstone elk: implications for trophic cascades.黄石国家公园的狼的存在与麋鹿对柳树的啃食增加:对营养级联效应的影响
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2454-66. doi: 10.1890/08-2017.1.
8
Fine-scale predation risk on elk after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, USA.美国黄石国家公园重新引入狼后麋鹿面临的精细尺度捕食风险。
Oecologia. 2008 Apr;155(4):869-77. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0956-z. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
9
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: reply.狼在拯救黄石国家公园的山杨吗?对行为介导的营养级联的景观尺度测试:回应。
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1425-31. doi: 10.1890/11-1404.1.
10
Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade: comment.狼在拯救黄石国家公园的山杨吗?对行为介导的营养级联的景观尺度测试:评论
Ecology. 2013 Jun;94(6):1420-5. doi: 10.1890/11-0063.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting risk patterns from human hunters and a large carnivore influence the habitat selection of shared prey.人类猎手与大型食肉动物截然不同的风险模式影响着共享猎物的栖息地选择。
Oecologia. 2025 Jul 1;207(7):118. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05742-z.
2
Behavioral trade-offs and multitasking by elk in relation to predation risk from Mexican gray wolves.麋鹿在应对墨西哥灰狼捕食风险时的行为权衡与多任务处理
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 26;14(5):e11383. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11383. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Top-predator recovery abates geomorphic decline of a coastal ecosystem.
顶级捕食者的恢复减缓了沿海生态系统的地貌下降。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(7997):111-118. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06959-9. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
4
The presence of wolves leads to spatial differentiation in deer browsing pressure on forest regeneration.狼群的存在导致鹿对森林更新的取食压力在空间上出现分化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44502-y.
5
Top predator restricts the niche breadth of prey: effects of assisted colonization of Tasmanian devils on a widespread omnivorous prey.顶级捕食者限制了猎物的生态位宽度:塔斯马尼亚恶魔的协助引种对广泛存在的杂食性猎物的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 29;290(1995):20222113. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2113. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Maternal carryover, winter severity, and brown bear abundance relate to elk demographics.母体残留、冬季严酷程度和棕熊丰度与麋鹿种群动态有关。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0274359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274359. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk ().评估麋鹿夏季的捕食风险景观和食物质量()。 (原文括号内容缺失,翻译可能不太完整准确)
Ecol Evol. 2022 Aug 11;12(8):e9201. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9201. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Alternations in the foraging behaviour of a primary consumer drive patch transition dynamics in a temperate rocky reef ecosystem.在温带多岩石礁生态系统中,初级消费者觅食行为的改变驱动斑块过渡动态。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Aug;25(8):1827-1838. doi: 10.1111/ele.14064. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
"Ecology of fear" in ungulates: Opportunities for improving conservation.有蹄类动物的“恐惧生态学”:改善保护工作的机遇
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 1;12(3):e8657. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8657. eCollection 2022 Feb.
10
Sampling bias exaggerates a textbook example of a trophic cascade.抽样偏差夸大了一个营养级联的典型教科案例。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Jan;25(1):177-188. doi: 10.1111/ele.13915. Epub 2021 Nov 8.