HCMS Group, Cheyenne, WY, USA.
J Med Econ. 2010;13(4):633-40. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.527588. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
Medication adherence in chronic diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) plays an important role in predicting long-term outcomes, yet existing data on adherence in employee populations are not found. The objective of this study is to compare adherence among employees treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for MS in the year following treatment initiation.
A healthcare claims database of US employees from 2001 to 2008 was used to identify patients with MS based on two or more DMT prescriptions or one DMT prescription with an MS diagnosis (ICD-9 340.xx). Employees continuously employed and with health plan coverage for 1 year following DMT initiation were eligible. Two measures were used in estimating adherence after DMT initiation: (1) persistence (the number of days from DMT initiation to the first 30-day gap in supply) and, (2) annual compliance, assessed by the medication possession ratio (MPR = number of days with a medication supply in the year divided by 365 days). Wilcoxon tests on time-to-event data and t-tests were used to compare persistence and MPR, respectively, between DMT groups. Other measures of resource utilization were also compared.
Overall, 358 employees [179 interferon [IFN]-β1a-IM (Avonex* = 'A'); 63 IFN-β1b (Betaseron† = 'B'); 20 IFN-β1a-SC (Rebif‡ = 'R'); 96 glatiramer acetate (Copaxone§ = 'C')] were eligible for analysis. No significant differences in age, gender, and certain job-related variables existed between cohorts. Persistence was better for 'A' than 'B' (p = 0.039), 'C' (p = 0.0007), and 'R' (p = 0.130). At 1 year, a greater proportion of 'A' employees were persistent (60.34%) than 'B' (42.86%, p = 0.016), 'C' (42.71%, p = 0.0052), and 'R' (45.00%, p = 0.190). 'A' also had the highest MPR (0.782) which was significantly higher than 'C' (MPR = 0.698, p = 0.0160) and statistically equivalent to 'B' (MPR = 0.705, p = 0.0576) and 'R' (MPR = 0.761, p = 0.7347).
The study has limitations characteristic of administrative claims database studies and small sample sizes. The population may not be representative of undiagnosed/untreated MS patients, those not able to maintain employment, and those not using the initial therapy.
CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE: Among employees treated with 'A', 'B', 'C', and 'R' for MS, 'A' patients had significantly greater medication adherence.
在多发性硬化症(MS)等慢性病中,药物依从性在预测长期结局方面起着重要作用,但目前尚未发现员工群体中药物依从性的数据。本研究的目的是比较在开始治疗后的一年内接受疾病修正治疗(DMT)治疗的员工的依从性。
使用美国 2001 年至 2008 年的医疗保健索赔数据库,根据两个或更多 DMT 处方或一个 DMT 处方和 MS 诊断(ICD-9 340.xx)来确定 MS 患者。符合条件的患者为在 DMT 起始后连续 1 年受雇且有健康计划覆盖的员工。在 DMT 起始后,使用两种方法估计依从性:(1)持久性(从 DMT 起始到首次 30 天供应中断的天数)和,(2)年度合规性,通过药物占有率(MPR=药物供应天数除以 365 天)评估。对时间到事件数据进行 Wilcoxon 检验,对 MPR 分别进行 t 检验,以比较 DMT 组之间的持久性和 MPR。还比较了其他资源利用措施。
总体而言,358 名员工[179 名干扰素-β1a-IM(Avonex*=“A”);63 名干扰素-β1b(Betaseron†=“B”);20 名干扰素-β1a-SC(Rebif‡=“R”);96 名格拉替雷酸盐(Copaxone§=“C”)]符合分析条件。队列之间在年龄、性别和某些与工作相关的变量方面没有显著差异。“A”的持久性优于“B”(p=0.039)、“C”(p=0.0007)和“R”(p=0.130)。在 1 年时,“A”组的持久性较高(60.34%),而非“B”组(42.86%,p=0.016)、“C”组(42.71%,p=0.0052)和“R”组(45.00%,p=0.190)。“A”的 MPR 也最高(0.782),明显高于“C”(MPR=0.698,p=0.0160),与“B”(MPR=0.705,p=0.0576)和“R”(MPR=0.761,p=0.7347)统计学等效。
该研究存在行政索赔数据库研究和样本量小的特点。该人群可能无法代表未确诊/未经治疗的 MS 患者、无法维持就业的患者以及未使用初始治疗的患者。
结论/相关性:在接受“ A”、“ B”、“ C”和“ R”治疗的 MS 员工中,“ A”患者的药物依从性明显更高。